{"id":957,"date":"2020-06-08T16:53:27","date_gmt":"2020-06-08T13:53:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=957"},"modified":"2023-06-01T14:07:32","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T14:07:32","slug":"destekten-yoksun-kalma-tazminati-evlenme-ihtimali","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/08\/destekten-yoksun-kalma-tazminati-evlenme-ihtimali\/","title":{"rendered":"Destekten Yoksun Kalma Tazminat\u0131: Evlenme \u0130htimali"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2018\/2651 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/70 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>(42 ya\u015f\u0131na) kadar hala evlenmedi\u011fi \u2026. yeniden evlenme \u015fans\u0131 tablosuna g\u00f6re art\u0131k evlenme ihtimali kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u2026. \u015eu halde, \u2026. rapor tarihindeki fiili durumun esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u2026.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>&#8230;. \u00f6lenin, fiili \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihine kadar babas\u0131na destek olaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek davac\u0131lar\u0131n destek paylar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ve as\u0131l davada talep edilen maddi&nbsp;<mark>tazminat\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;buna g\u00f6re hesaplanmas\u0131<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>HMK 355. maddesindeki kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri resen g\u00f6zetilmek \u00fczere istinaf incelemesinin, istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen sebeplerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 &#8230;.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 26. Hukuk Dairesi<br>\u0130LK DERECE<br>MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<br>Davac\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230;\u2019e velayeten &#8230; vekili Avukat &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan, as\u0131l davada daval\u0131lar Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e, EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve &#8230; aleyhine 28\/02\/2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7e ile trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan maddi tazminat, birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131lar Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e, EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi aleyhine 05\/01\/2016 tarihinde verilen dilek\u00e7e ile trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan manevi tazminat istenmesi \u00fczerine mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; as\u0131l davada daval\u0131lardan Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddine, di\u011fer daval\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, birle\u015fen davada Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten, Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yarg\u0131 yolu nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine, EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 29\/12\/2016 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karara kar\u015f\u0131 as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131lar vekili, as\u0131l davada adli yard\u0131m talepli olarak daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili, as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekilinin ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine daval\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019n\u0131n adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan incelemede; davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili, daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fcne, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve as\u0131l davada Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddine, di\u011fer daval\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, birle\u015fen davada Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten, Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yarg\u0131 yolu nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine, EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 28\/12\/2017 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay\u2019ca incelenmesi as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131lar vekili, as\u0131l davada adli yard\u0131m talepli olarak daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili, as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde istenilmekle temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra tetkik hakimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor ile dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc.<br>1) Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle <strong>HMK 355. maddesindeki kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri resen g\u00f6zetilmek \u00fczere istinaf incelemesinin, istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen sebeplerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131<\/strong> kural\u0131na uygun bi\u00e7imde inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131p karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na, dava \u015fartlar\u0131, delillerin toplanmas\u0131 ve hukukun uygulanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir bir neden bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230;\u2019in a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 reddedilmelidir.<br>2) Davac\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince;<br>As\u0131l dava trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu \u00f6l\u00fcmden kaynaklanan maddi tazminat, birle\u015fen dava ise trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu \u00f6l\u00fcmden kaynaklanan manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<br>Davac\u0131lar vekili, davac\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019in e\u015fi, di\u011fer davac\u0131 &#8230;\u2019in babas\u0131 olan &#8230;\u2019in, daval\u0131 &#8230; y\u00f6netimindeki EGO otob\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn neden oldu\u011fu 17\/06\/2007 tarihinde meydana gelen trafik kazas\u0131nda vefat etti\u011fini, dava konusu olayla ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fclen ceza davas\u0131nda daval\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019n\u0131n birinci derecede asli kusurlu oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fini ve mahkumiyetine karar verildi\u011fini, m\u00fcteveffan\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda vin\u00e7 operat\u00f6r\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn kusuru nedeniyle davac\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019in e\u015finin, di\u011fer davac\u0131 &#8230;\u2019in babas\u0131n\u0131n deste\u011fini yitirdi\u011fini belirterek as\u0131l davada olu\u015fan maddi zarar\u0131n tazminini, birle\u015fen davada ise olu\u015fan manevi zarar\u0131n tazminini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>As\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<br>Mahkemece, al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131na itibar edilerek as\u0131l davada daval\u0131lardan Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddine, di\u011fer daval\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131lardan Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n yarg\u0131 yolu nedeniyle reddine, daval\u0131lardan Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddine, daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Karara kar\u015f\u0131 as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131lar vekili ile daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili, as\u0131l davada adli yard\u0131m talepli olarak daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf talebinde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<br>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince; daval\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019n\u0131n adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili, daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fcne, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve as\u0131l davada Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddine, di\u011fer daval\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, birle\u015fen davada Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten, Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yarg\u0131 yolu nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine, EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131lar vekili ile daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili, as\u0131l davada adli yard\u0131m talepli olarak daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br><strong><mark>Destekten<\/mark>&nbsp;<mark>yoksun<\/mark>&nbsp;<mark>kalma<\/mark>&nbsp;<mark>tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;hesaplar\u0131nda dikkat edilmesi gereken hususlardan biri, dul e\u015fin yeniden evlenme ihtimalinin nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r. Hesaplama, bilinmeyen d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in farazi baz\u0131 kriterlere g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmakta ise de; evlenme ihtimali belirlemesinde dul e\u015fin hesap tarihi itibari ile evlenip evlenmedi\u011fi tespit edilebilir bir olgudur. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda, olay tarihinde davac\u0131 e\u015f &#8230;\u2019in 32 ya\u015f\u0131nda olmas\u0131na ve 18 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir \u00e7ocu\u011funun bulunmas\u0131na g\u00f6re evlenme ihtimali belirlenmi\u015f ve hesaplanan&nbsp;<mark>destekten<\/mark>&nbsp;<mark>yoksun<\/mark>&nbsp;<mark>kalma<\/mark>&nbsp;<mark>tazminat\u0131ndan<\/mark>&nbsp;%12 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak 1974 do\u011fumlu olan davac\u0131 &#8230;\u2019in rapor tarihine (42 ya\u015f\u0131na) kadar hala evlenmedi\u011fi ve AY\u0130M&#8217;in dul kalan kad\u0131n i\u00e7in haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeniden evlenme \u015fans\u0131 tablosuna g\u00f6re art\u0131k evlenme ihtimali&nbsp;<mark>kalmad\u0131<\/mark>\u011f\u0131 dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u015eu halde, bilinen d\u00f6nem ger\u00e7ekli\u011finin yani rapor tarihindeki fiili durumun esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken davac\u0131 e\u015fin evlenme ihtimalinin olay tarihine g\u00f6re belirlenerek as\u0131l davada talep edilen maddi tazminattan %12 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><br>3) Davac\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230;\u2019in di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince;<br>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda, \u00f6lenin babas\u0131 &#8230;\u2019in vefat etti\u011fine dair dosya kapsam\u0131nda bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan PMF ya\u015fam tablosuna g\u00f6re 31\/12\/2017 tarihine kadar ya\u015fayaca\u011f\u0131 varsay\u0131m\u0131 ile davac\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230;\u2019in \u00f6lenin deste\u011finden alaca\u011f\u0131 paylar belirlenmi\u015ftir. <strong>Ancak \u00f6len &#8230;\u2019e ait n\u00fcfus kay\u0131t \u00f6rne\u011finin incelenmesinden, babas\u0131 &#8230;\u2019in 21\/06\/2016 tarihinde vefat etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u015eu durumda bilinen bu olgu da dikkate al\u0131narak \u00f6lenin, fiili \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihine kadar babas\u0131na destek olaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek davac\u0131lar\u0131n destek paylar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ve as\u0131l davada talep edilen maddi&nbsp;<mark>tazminat\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;buna g\u00f6re hesaplanmas\u0131 hususunda ek rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/strong> Karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle de bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (2 ve 3) numaral\u0131 bentlerde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle temyiz edilen B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n HMK 373\/2 ve 371. maddesi gere\u011fince davac\u0131lar yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, daval\u0131lardan EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekilinin as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davaya, daval\u0131lardan &#8230;\u2019n\u0131n as\u0131l davaya y\u00f6nelik t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davaya y\u00f6nelik di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ilk bentte g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle reddine, dosyan\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine ve davac\u0131lardan pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde geri verilmesine 15\/01\/2020 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2018\/2651 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/70 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 26. Hukuk Dairesi\u0130LK DERECEMAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; Asliye Hukuk MahkemesiDavac\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230;\u2019e velayeten &#8230; vekili Avukat &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan, as\u0131l davada daval\u0131lar Ba\u015fkent Ula\u015f\u0131m ve Do\u011falgaz Hizmetleri Proje A\u015e, EGO Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve &#8230; aleyhine 28\/02\/2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7e [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1879,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-maddi-manevi-tazminat","category-trafik-kazasi-tazminatlari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=957"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2040,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/957\/revisions\/2040"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1879"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}