{"id":1686,"date":"2019-12-12T11:00:39","date_gmt":"2019-12-12T11:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1686"},"modified":"2023-07-25T10:36:30","modified_gmt":"2023-07-25T10:36:30","slug":"malik-olmayan-surucu-dava-acabilir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2019\/12\/12\/malik-olmayan-surucu-dava-acabilir\/","title":{"rendered":"Malik olmayan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc dava a\u00e7abilir."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/1-Kisa-aciklama-8.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1687\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Malik olmayan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc dava a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc olmas\u0131, arac\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi eksiksiz ve hasars\u0131z olarak malikine teslim etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, arac\u0131n zilyedi s\u0131fat\u0131yla, hasar tazmini y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131 ve aktif husumet ehliyeti vard\u0131r. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/2-Karar-10.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1688\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>17. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2014\/19691 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2014\/14136 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 13. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<br>TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 26\/09\/2013<br>NUMARASI : 2012\/163-2013\/537<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda; kararda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 D.. A.. vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>-K A R A R-<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu araca daval\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flu olan Y.\u00d6.idaresindeki ara\u00e7la arkadan \u00e7arpmas\u0131 sonucu hasarlanmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in 3.600,00.-TL \u00f6demeyi taahh\u00fct etti\u011fini ancak \u00f6demede bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 3.600,00.-TL maddi tazminat\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 Z.. \u00d6.. vekili, daval\u0131n\u0131n kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc ya da i\u015fletini olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve pasif dava ehliyeti olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Mahkemece, iddia, savunma, toplanan kan\u0131tlara ve benimsenen bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re; davac\u0131n\u0131n hasara u\u011frayan arac\u0131n maliki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ara\u00e7 malikine ait oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131n\u0131n aktif husumet ehliyeti bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Dava trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oludu\u011fu ara\u00e7ta meydana gelen hasar\u0131n tazmini istemine ili\u015fkindir.<br>Tazminat davas\u0131nda davac\u0131 olma ehliyeti, kural olarak mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan do\u011frudan do\u011fruya zarar g\u00f6ren ki\u015fiye aittir. Ancak, bir \u015feyi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle (kira, ariyet vs.) elinde bulunduran ki\u015fi, onu ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi malikine aynen iade etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olup, \u00f6demek zorunda oldu\u011fu onar\u0131m giderlerini isteyebilecektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Davac\u0131, ara\u00e7 hasar\u0131 nedeni ile daval\u0131 ile aralar\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 anla\u015fma uyar\u0131nca 3.600,00.-TL maddi tazminat\u0131n tahsili talebinde bulunmu\u015f, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu talebi mahkemece arac\u0131n tescil kayd\u0131n\u0131n dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 3. ki\u015fi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/5-Sonuc-8.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1689\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Dosyada mevcut ceza soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma belgelerinden davac\u0131 D.. A..&#8217;\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc olmas\u0131, arac\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi eksiksiz ve hasars\u0131z olarak malikine teslim etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, arac\u0131n zilyedi s\u0131fat\u0131yla, hasar tazmini y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131 ve aktif husumet ehliyeti vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>O halde mahkemece, davac\u0131 D.. A..&#8217;\u0131n aktif husumet ehliyetinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile davan\u0131n esas\u0131na girilerek, taraflar\u0131n delillerinin toplanmas\u0131 ile var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden davac\u0131ya geri verilmesine 23.10.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Malik olmayan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc dava a\u00e7abilir. Kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc olmas\u0131, arac\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi eksiksiz ve hasars\u0131z olarak malikine teslim etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, arac\u0131n zilyedi s\u0131fat\u0131yla, hasar tazmini y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131 ve aktif husumet ehliyeti vard\u0131r. 17. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2014\/19691 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2014\/14136 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 13. Asliye Hukuk MahkemesiTAR\u0130H\u0130 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1779,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,18,23],"tags":[242,293,302],"class_list":["post-1686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-arac-hasarlari-ve-deger-kaybi","category-manset","category-trafik-kazasi-tazminatlari","tag-malik","tag-surucu","tag-trafik-kazasi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1686"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1686\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1792,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1686\/revisions\/1792"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}