{"id":1670,"date":"2019-12-11T15:50:10","date_gmt":"2019-12-11T15:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1670"},"modified":"2023-07-25T10:36:50","modified_gmt":"2023-07-25T10:36:50","slug":"kazanc-kaybi-zorunlu-sigortadan-istenemez","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2019\/12\/11\/kazanc-kaybi-zorunlu-sigortadan-istenemez\/","title":{"rendered":"Kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 zorunlu sigortadan istenemez."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/1-Kisa-aciklama-6.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1671\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 zarar\u0131n\u0131n, kazadan kaynaklanan dolayl\u0131 zarar mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu ve daval\u0131 trafik<br>sigortac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n sadece do\u011frudan zararlardan sorumlu oldu\u011fu, bu zarar\u0131n Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortas\u0131<br>Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 ve poli\u00e7e \u00f6zel \u015fartlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca teminat kapsam\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/2-Karar-8.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1672\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">17. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/6083 E. , 2020\/4887 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<br>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, kararda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle, davan\u0131n<br>k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230; Sigorta A.\u015e. vekili<br>taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>-K A R A RDavac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar\u0131n i\u015fleteni, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc ve trafik sigortac\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kusuru nedeniyle ya\u015fanan<br>zincirleme kazada davac\u0131 arac\u0131n\u0131n hasar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, hasar bedelini kasko sigortac\u0131lar\u0131ndan ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131; ancak<br>ara\u00e7taki de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ve tamir s\u00fcresince arac\u0131n kullan\u0131lamamas\u0131ndan do\u011fan kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini;<br>davac\u0131n\u0131n gazete da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m i\u015fi yapan \u015firketin Kahramanmara\u015f bayisi oldu\u011funu ve arac\u0131n g\u00fcnl\u00fck kazanc\u0131n\u0131n<br>350,00 TL. oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131 arac\u0131n\u0131n tamirde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre nedeniyle kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011funu, (de\u011fer<br>kayb\u0131ndan t\u00fcm daval\u0131lar ile kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131ndan sadece ara\u00e7 sahipleri ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri sorumlu olmak kayd\u0131yla)<br>23.000,00 TL. ara\u00e7 de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ile 10.000,00 TL. kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n kaza tarihinden i\u015fleyecek reesekont faiziyle<br>birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fcteselsilen tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Daval\u0131lar vekilleri, kusur ve zarara itiraz ederek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Mahkemece, kararda yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle ve benimsenen bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re; daval\u0131 &#8230; \u015firketleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<br>davan\u0131n reddine, di\u011fer daval\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile 3.500,00 TL. de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ve 3.000,00<br>TL. kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 toplam\u0131 6.500,00 TL&#8217;nin daval\u0131lardan tahsiline, fazla iste\u011fin reddine dair verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn<br>davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230;.Ltd. \u015eti. vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine, Dairemizin<br>25.01.2016 tarih, 2015\/10017 Esas ve 2016\/832 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile karar bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile<br>17.000,00 TL. ara\u00e7 de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ve 2.800,00 TL. kar mahrumiyet zarar\u0131 olmak \u00fczere toplam 19.800,00 TL&#8217;nin<br>dava tarihinden i\u015fleyecek yasal faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131lardan tahsiline, sigorta \u015firketinin poli\u00e7esindeki limitle<br>sorumlu tutulmas\u0131na, fazla iste\u011fin reddine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili ile<br>daval\u0131 &#8230; &#8230; Sigorta A.\u015e. vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/5-Sonuc-6.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1673\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince toplanan delillerin<br>takdirinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na; daha \u00f6nce temyize konu edilip kesinle\u015fen y\u00f6nlere<br>ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n yeniden incelenmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131na; konusunda uzman bilirki\u015fi heyeti<br>taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporla, ara\u00e7 de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcnce belirlenmi\u015f ve bu raporun h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f<br>olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re; davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230; &#8230;Sigorta A.\u015e. vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin<br>kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan ara\u00e7 de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ve ara\u00e7 mahrumiyet bedelinin tahsili istemine<br>ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Daval\u0131 &#8230; Sigorta A.\u015e, di\u011fer daval\u0131 &#8230; G\u0131da A.\u015e&#8217;ye ait arac\u0131n trafik sigortac\u0131s\u0131 olup ZMSS poli\u00e7esi gere\u011fi,<br>davac\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131nda meydana gelen hasara ili\u015fkin ger\u00e7ek zarar miktar\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 sorumludur. Davac\u0131 vekili, ara\u00e7<br>mahrumiyeti zarar\u0131n\u0131n sigorta \u015firketleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki daval\u0131lardan tahsilini talep etmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve Dairemizin<br>\u00f6nceki bozma ilam\u0131nda da trafik sigortac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bu zarardan sorumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na<br>ra\u011fmen, daval\u0131 &#8230; \u015firketinin ara\u00e7 mahrumiyetinden kaynaklanan kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131ndan sorumlu tutuldu\u011fu<br>g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><strong>Kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131na ili\u015fkin zarar\u0131n, kazadan kaynaklanan dolayl\u0131 zarar mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu ve daval\u0131 trafik<br>sigortac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n sadece do\u011frudan zararlardan sorumlu oldu\u011fu, bu zarar\u0131n Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortas\u0131<br>Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 ve poli\u00e7e \u00f6zel \u015fartlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca teminat kapsam\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi<br>gerekir<\/strong>ken, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 26\/1. maddesindeki taleple ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ilkesine de ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde (davac\u0131 talebi<br>a\u015f\u0131larak) kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131ndan trafik sigortac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>3-Davaya konu edilen kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve yap\u0131lacak hesab\u0131n esaslar\u0131,<br>Dairemizin \u00f6nceki bozma ilam\u0131nda detayl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, bozma ilam\u0131nda belirtilen<br>esaslara uygun olmayacak bi\u00e7imde bu zarar kalemi i\u00e7in hesap yapan yetersiz rapora g\u00f6re karar verildi\u011fi<br>g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel (K1) yetki belgesiyle gazete da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m i\u015finde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n\u0131n onar\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresince, \u00f6zel yetki<br>belgesi bulunmayan bir ba\u015fka ara\u00e7la i\u015fini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle de, davac\u0131n\u0131n bayisi oldu\u011fu<br>\u015firketten kaza tarihi itibariyle o ara\u00e7la yap\u0131lan da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m i\u015fi i\u00e7in davac\u0131ya yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin sorulmas\u0131; gerekirse<br>davac\u0131n\u0131n ticari defter ve kay\u0131tlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131; arac\u0131n <strong>makul tamir s\u00fcresi olarak<\/strong> belirlenen 14 g\u00fcn i\u00e7in <strong>kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>A\u00e7\u0131klanan vak\u0131alar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkemece; Dairemizin \u00f6nceki bozma ilam\u0131nda kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 belirlemesine<br>ili\u015fkin belirtilen hususlar da dikkate al\u0131n\u0131p, davac\u0131n\u0131n bayisi oldu\u011fu &#8230; Paz. Da\u011f. A.\u015e&#8217;nin 10.03.2017 tarihli<br>cevabi yaz\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fi (davac\u0131ya 1 ay i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeye ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmadan), arac\u0131n 14 g\u00fcnl\u00fck<br>makul tamir s\u00fcresi, ara\u00e7 i\u00e7in yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 halde arac\u0131n kullan\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle tasarruf edilen yak\u0131t, \u015fof\u00f6r<br>\u00fccreti, amortisman vs.&#8217;nin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi gereklili\u011fi hususlar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek ve gerekirse davac\u0131n\u0131n ticari defterleri<br>\u00fczerinde inceleme de yap\u0131larak, kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 hesab\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ek rapor al\u0131n\u0131p olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar<br>verilmesi gerekirken, eksik incelemeyle h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131na ili\u015fkin zarar\u0131n, kazadan kaynaklanan dolayl\u0131 zarar mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu ve daval\u0131 trafik<br \/>\nsigortac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n sadece do\u011frudan zararlardan sorumlu oldu\u011fu, bu zarar\u0131n Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortas\u0131 Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 ve poli\u00e7e \u00f6zel \u015fartlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca teminat kapsam\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1779,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,18,23],"tags":[58,210,337,338],"class_list":["post-1670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-arac-hasarlari-ve-deger-kaybi","category-manset","category-trafik-kazasi-tazminatlari","tag-arac","tag-kazanc-kaybi","tag-zorunlu-mali-sigorta","tag-zorunlu-sigorta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1670"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1794,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670\/revisions\/1794"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}