{"id":1622,"date":"2021-12-06T19:37:49","date_gmt":"2021-12-06T16:37:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1622"},"modified":"2023-05-25T14:25:34","modified_gmt":"2023-05-25T14:25:34","slug":"cift-vadeli-senetler-bono-sayilamaz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2021\/12\/06\/cift-vadeli-senetler-bono-sayilamaz\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00c7ift vadeli senet, bono say\u0131lamaz."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Bonoda,  vade tarihinin, rakamla “30.10.2008”, yaz\u0131 ile “30 Ekim 2010” olarak yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00c7ift vadeli olarak d\u00fczenlenen senetler, bono vasf\u0131nda say\u0131lamaz<\/mark>.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

12. Hukuk Dairesi         2013\/16429 E.  ,  2013\/25385 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MAHKEME KARARI<\/p>\n\n\n\n


Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in  Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan  d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n\n\n\n


Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan  bonoya dayal\u0131 kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yolu ile takipte bor\u00e7lunun, yasal s\u00fcrede icra mahkemesine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda, senedi bo\u015f olarak verdi\u011fini, senedin teminata ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, tanzim tarihinde tahrifat oldu\u011funu,  senette iki farkl\u0131 vade bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, takibin iptalini talep etti\u011fi, mahkemece, itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n


Somut olayda takip dayana\u011f\u0131 bonoda,  vade tarihinin, rakamla “30.10.2008”, yaz\u0131 ile “30 Ekim 2010” olarak yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Takip dayana\u011f\u0131 bononun tanzim tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan T.T.K.nun 690. maddesinin g\u00f6ndermesi ile bonolar hakk\u0131nda da uygulanmas\u0131 gereken ayn\u0131 Kanunun 615. maddesine g\u00f6re, \u00e7ift vadeli olarak d\u00fczenlenen senetler, bono vasf\u0131nda say\u0131lamaz<\/mark>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n


O halde, mahkemece  \u0130\u0130K.nun 170\/a maddesi gere\u011fince takibin iptaline karar verilmesi gerekir<\/strong>ken bu hususun g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilerek istemin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n


SONU\u00c7  : <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bor\u00e7lunun  temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K 366 ve HUMK\u2019nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca (BOZULMASINA), pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde iadesine, ilam\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere,  04.07.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bonoda,  vade tarihinin, rakamla “30.10.2008”, yaz\u0131 ile “30 Ekim 2010” olarak yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00c7ift vadeli olarak d\u00fczenlenen senetler, bono vasf\u0131nda say\u0131lamaz. 12. Hukuk Dairesi         2013\/16429 E.  ,  2013\/25385 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEME KARARI Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1808,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[79,92,93,280],"class_list":["post-1622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-icra-hukuku","tag-bono","tag-cift-vadeli","tag-cift-vadeli-senet","tag-senet"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1622"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1812,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622\/revisions\/1812"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1808"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}