{"id":1178,"date":"2020-06-16T20:02:30","date_gmt":"2020-06-16T17:02:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1178"},"modified":"2023-05-29T09:48:32","modified_gmt":"2023-05-29T09:48:32","slug":"kusuru-daha-agir-olmamak-kosuluyla-suresiz-nafaka-istenebilir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/16\/kusuru-daha-agir-olmamak-kosuluyla-suresiz-nafaka-istenebilir\/","title":{"rendered":"Kusuru daha a\u011f\u0131r olmamak ko\u015fuluyla s\u00fcresiz nafaka istenebilir"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/159 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1523 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi<br>DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<br>2-\u0130lk derece mahkemesi, her iki taraf\u0131n da k\u00f6k ailelerinin evliliklerine a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 m\u00fcdahale ettikleri, daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmekle tehdit etti\u011fi, sonras\u0131nda bunu e\u015fini korkutmak amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, bu gibi tutars\u0131z, fevri davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011fu, kendi kendine zarar verdi\u011fi, bu davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n neticesinde davac\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131ndan endi\u015fe duydu\u011fu, korku i\u00e7inde ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle evinden ayr\u0131lmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n ise k\u00f6k ailesine a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, e\u015finin ailesi ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istemedi\u011fi ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi bu hali ile erke\u011fin a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle, kad\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na kad\u0131n lehine ayl\u0131k 400 TL tedbir-yoksulluk&nbsp;<mark>nafakas\u0131na<\/mark>, 15.000 TL maddi, 15.000 TL manevi tazminata karar vermi\u015f, taraflarca istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, istinaf incelemesini yapan b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince; \u201c\u0130lk derece mahkemesince daval\u0131 erke\u011fe kusur olarak y\u00fcklenen k\u00f6k ailesine a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131na ve e\u015finin ailesiyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesini istemedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir delil yoktur. Daval\u0131 erke\u011fin &#8220;e\u015fini tehdit edip tutars\u0131z ve fevri davran\u0131\u015flar sergileyip davac\u0131 e\u015fine hakaret etmek, bu sebeple e\u015finin evden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131na sebebiyet vermek&#8221; \u015feklindeki kusurlu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;k\u00f6k ailesinin evliliklerine a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 m\u00fcdahale etmesi&#8221; \u015feklinde kusurlu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 yan\u0131nda &#8220;daval\u0131 e\u015fine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 e\u015finin ailesine so\u011fuk davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu hale g\u00f6re, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle erke\u011fin kusur tespitine, kad\u0131n lehine h\u00fckmedilen yoksulluk&nbsp;<mark>nafakas\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;ve tazminatlara ili\u015fkin istinaf talebinin kabul\u00fc ile, kad\u0131n\u0131n tazminat ve yoksulluk&nbsp;<mark>nafakas\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;isteminin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve toplanan delilerden; b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince davac\u0131 kad\u0131na y\u00fcklenen &#8220;\u015fiddet&#8221; vak\u0131as\u0131n\u0131n mevcut delil durumuna g\u00f6re ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince belirlenen ve ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen di\u011fer kusurlu davran\u0131\u015flara g\u00f6re kad\u0131na nazaran erke\u011fin a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kusur belirlemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<br>3-Yukar\u0131da 2. bentte a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131na sebep olan olaylarda tazminat isteyen davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r ya da e\u015fit kusurlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu olaylar\u0131n onun ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 te\u015fkil etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bo\u015fanma sonucu bu e\u015f, en az\u0131ndan di\u011ferinin maddi deste\u011fini yitirmi\u015ftir. O halde, taraflar\u0131n sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131, tazminata esas olan fiilin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile hakkaniyet kurallar\u0131 (TMK m. 4) dikkate al\u0131narak kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na maddi ve manevi tazminata (TMK m. 174\/1-2) karar vermek gerekirken, hatal\u0131 kusur belirlemesinin sonucu olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<br>4-Bo\u015fanma y\u00fcz\u00fcnden yoksullu\u011fa d\u00fc\u015fecek taraf, kusuru daha a\u011f\u0131r olmamak ko\u015fuluyla ge\u00e7imi i\u00e7in di\u011fer taraftan mali g\u00fcc\u00fc oran\u0131nda s\u00fcresiz olarak&nbsp;<mark>nafaka<\/mark>&nbsp;isteyebilir.&nbsp;<mark>Nafaka<\/mark>&nbsp;y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusuru aranmaz. (TMK m. 175) Yukar\u0131da 2. bentte a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, bo\u015fanmaya sebep olan olaylarda davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n daha a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, herhangi bir geliri ve malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bo\u015fanma y\u00fcz\u00fcnden yoksullu\u011fa d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. O halde, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na ge\u00e7imi i\u00e7in uygun miktarda yoksulluk&nbsp;<mark>nafakas\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;takdiri gerekirken, hatal\u0131 kusur belirlemesinin sonucu olarak iste\u011fin reddi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (2.), (3.) ve (4.) bentlerde g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesinin 2019\/1317 esas &#8211; 2019\/1794 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin ise yukar\u0131da (1.) bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 25.02.2020 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/159 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1523 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk DairesiDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1763,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bosanma-nafaka-mal-paylasimi-velayet"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1178"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1891,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1178\/revisions\/1891"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1763"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}