{"id":1171,"date":"2020-06-16T19:48:52","date_gmt":"2020-06-16T16:48:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1171"},"modified":"2023-05-29T09:49:44","modified_gmt":"2023-05-29T09:49:44","slug":"icra-ve-iflas-kanununun-340-maddesi-hapis-cezasi-sartlari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/16\/icra-ve-iflas-kanununun-340-maddesi-hapis-cezasi-sartlari\/","title":{"rendered":"Taahh\u00fcd\u00fc ihlal su\u00e7u nedir?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>12. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/455 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1400 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><br>Bor\u00e7lunun \u00f6deme \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanunu\u2019nun 340. maddesi gere\u011fince 3 aya kadar tazyik hapsi ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair &#8230; \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesinin 13\/12\/2017 tarihli ve 2017\/470 esas, 2017\/492 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii &#8230; 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26\/01\/2018 tarihli ve 2018\/10 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 aleyhine &#8230; Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24\/12\/2019 g\u00fcn ve 94660652-105-48-4458-2019-Kyb say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemini i\u00e7eren yaz\u0131s\u0131 ekindeki dava dosyas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 16\/12\/2019 g\u00fcn ve KYB.2019\/136067 say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarnamesi ile Dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle okundu.<br>An\u0131lan ihbarnamede;<br>1-2004 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 340. maddesi gere\u011fince taahh\u00fcd\u00fc ihlal su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in taahh\u00fct tutana\u011f\u0131nda toplam bor\u00e7 miktar\u0131n\u0131n, i\u015fleyen ve i\u015fleyecek faizin, vekalet \u00fccreti, icra har\u00e7 ve giderlerinin birlikte belirlenerek bor\u00e7lunun taahh\u00fcd\u00fcne esas olan miktar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011fi halde, &#8230; 2. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2015\/8109 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde, 01\/08\/2017 tarihli taahh\u00fct tutana\u011f\u0131nda belirtilen unsurlar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fi, an\u0131lan taahh\u00fctte toplam faiz olarak 382,70 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131, belirtilen faizin hangi d\u00f6nemleri kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131, icra takiplerinin kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten taahh\u00fct tarihine kadar i\u015flemi\u015f ve taahh\u00fct tarihinden son \u00f6deme tarihine kadar i\u015fleyecek faiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n son \u00f6deme tarihine kadar i\u015fleyecek faizlerden feragat beyan\u0131n\u0131n da yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, taahh\u00fcd\u00fcn ge\u00e7erli olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmemesinde;<br>2-An\u0131lan taahh\u00fct\u00fcn, alacakl\u0131 ve alacakl\u0131 vekilinin yoklu\u011funda bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan verildi\u011fi ve taahh\u00fcde ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n alacakl\u0131 vekiline tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi gibi, alacakl\u0131 veya vekili taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f bir taahh\u00fcd\u00fc kabul muht\u0131ras\u0131n\u0131n da bor\u00e7luya tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan verilen taahh\u00fcd\u00fcn ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu sebeple de su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmemesinde;<br>3-Takip talebi ile \u00f6deme emrinde alacakl\u0131 olarak &#8230;. San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. G\u00f6sterildi\u011fi halde, &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan verilen &#8230; 5. Noterli\u011fince d\u00fczenlenen 01\/04\/2014 tarihli vekaletname ile Avukat&#8230;.. icra takibi ba\u015flatarak takibi ilerletici taleplerde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en avukat\u0131n an\u0131lan&nbsp;<mark>\u015firketin<\/mark>&nbsp;vekili oldu\u011funa dair bir vekaletname dosya i\u00e7erisinde olmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu taahh\u00fctnamenin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinde, isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 309.maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 isteminde bulunulmakla gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<br>Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine dayanan ihbarname i\u00e7eri\u011fi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, &#8230; 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26\/01\/2018 tarihli ve 2018\/10 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n CMK\u2019n\u0131n 309\/4-d maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u00f6deme \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eyleminden dolay\u0131 h\u00fckmolunan tazyik hapsinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na; 18\/02\/2020 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>12. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/455 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1400 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Bor\u00e7lunun \u00f6deme \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanunu\u2019nun 340. maddesi gere\u011fince 3 aya kadar tazyik hapsi ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair &#8230; \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesinin 13\/12\/2017 tarihli ve 2017\/470 esas, 2017\/492 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii &#8230; 5. Asliye [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1799,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-icra-senet-cek-ticaret"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1171"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1894,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171\/revisions\/1894"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}