{"id":1167,"date":"2020-06-16T19:29:24","date_gmt":"2020-06-16T16:29:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1167"},"modified":"2023-05-29T09:50:22","modified_gmt":"2023-05-29T09:50:22","slug":"istinaf-basvurusunun-kismen-dahi-olsa-kabul-edildigi-durumlarda-oncelikle-ilk-derece-mahkemesi-kararinin-kaldirilmasina-karar-verilmesi-ardindan-yeniden-tum-talepler-bakimindan-hukum-kurulmasi-gerekm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/16\/istinaf-basvurusunun-kismen-dahi-olsa-kabul-edildigi-durumlarda-oncelikle-ilk-derece-mahkemesi-kararinin-kaldirilmasina-karar-verilmesi-ardindan-yeniden-tum-talepler-bakimindan-hukum-kurulmasi-gerekm\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen dahi olsa kabul edildi\u011fi durumlarda \u00f6ncelikle ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi ard\u0131ndan, yeniden t\u00fcm talepler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2018\/6874 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/2379 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<br><br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen alacak davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm hakk\u0131nda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan istinaf incelemesi sonucunda; davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<br><br>Davac\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m hizmetinin tekel niteli\u011finde olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kay\u0131p ka\u00e7ak bedeli ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda fatura edilen bedelleri \u00f6demek durumunda b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, al\u0131nan bu bedellerin hukuk devleti ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etti\u011fini, kay\u0131p ka\u00e7ak bedellerinin kurallara uyan abonelerden tahsilinin \u00e7apraz subvansiyon yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu belirterek 2013\/4- 2016\/4 aras\u0131 fatura d\u00f6nemlerinde kay\u0131p ka\u00e7ak bedeli ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda daval\u0131ya \u00f6denen tutardan fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere 10.000,00.-TL\u2019nin temerr\u00fct tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek avans faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131, cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; dava konusu bedelleri&nbsp;<mark>\u015firketin<\/mark>&nbsp;belirlemedi\u011fini, kurul kararlar\u0131n\u0131 uygulaman\u0131n yasal zorunluluk oldu\u011funu, 6719 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik gere\u011fince davan\u0131n reddinin gerekti\u011fini, kay\u0131p ka\u00e7ak bedellerinin 2011 y\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde de da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m&nbsp;<mark>\u015firketlerince<\/mark>&nbsp;tahakkuk ettirilmesi nedeniyle davan\u0131n Osmangazi Elektrik Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m Anonim&nbsp;<mark>\u015eirketine<\/mark>&nbsp;ihbar\u0131n\u0131 istediklerini, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n usulen kabul edilemeyece\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br><br>\u0130lk derece mahkemesince; davac\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki mevzuat ve Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131 gere\u011fince dava a\u00e7makta hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ve ge\u00e7mi\u015fe etkili yasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ya da i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi halinde yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden sorumlu tutulamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131 lehine vekalet \u00fczeretine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ve h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131nda konusuz kalan davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve yarg\u0131lama giderinin daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmesine ra\u011fmen maktu vekalet \u00fccretinin ise davac\u0131dan tahsili ile daval\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, taraflarca istinaf edilmi\u015ftir.<br>B\u00f6lge adliye mahkesince; ilk derece mahkemesince yap\u0131lan vak\u0131a ve hukuki de\u011ferlendirmede usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak gerek\u00e7eli kararda daval\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden sorumlu oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen h\u00fck\u00fcmde vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p daval\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmesi nedeniyle verilen karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve gerek\u00e7e dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcmde maddi hata yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 3. bendinin &#8221; h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan AA\u00dcT uyar\u0131nca 2.180,00.-TL vekalet \u00fccretinin daval\u0131dan tahsili ile davac\u0131ya verilmesine&#8221; \u015feklinde d\u00fczeltilmesine, h\u00fckm\u00fcn d\u00fczeltilen k\u0131s\u0131m d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n aynen korunmas\u0131na, taraf vekillerinin di\u011fer istinaf nedenlerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f; verilen bu karar, davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>1-)B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin duru\u015fma yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n esas hakk\u0131nda istinaf incelemesi yapmalar\u0131 durumuna dair karar verme usul\u00fc 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 353\/1-b-2. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi; yarg\u0131lamada eksiklik bulunmamakla beraber, kanunun olaya uygulanmas\u0131nda hata edilip de yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ihtiya\u00e7 duyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde yahut karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde hata edilmi\u015f ise d\u00fczelterek yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda karar verir. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda yer almas\u0131 gereken hususlar ise HMK\u2019n\u0131n 359. maddesinde belirtilmi\u015f olup buna g\u00f6re kararda; \u201cTaraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti\u201d, \u201c\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti\u201d, \u201c\u0130leri s\u00fcr\u00fclen istinaf sebepleri\u201d ve \u201cTaraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu olan veya olmayan hususlarla bunlara ili\u015fkin delillerin tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131, ret ve \u00fcst\u00fcn tutma sebepleri, sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen vak\u0131alarla bunlardan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 ve hukuki sebep\u201d yer almas\u0131 gereken zorunlu unsurlard\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise &#8220;h\u00fckm\u00fcn sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye ait herhangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin, taleplerden her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n, s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda, a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gereklidir&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince ilk derece mahkemesinin h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 3. bendi d\u00fczeltilerek, d\u00fczeltilen k\u0131s\u0131m d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n aynen korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik karar verilmesi usule ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen dahi olsa kabul edildi\u011fi durumlarda \u00f6ncelikle ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi ard\u0131ndan, yeniden t\u00fcm talepler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<br>O halde b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan HMK\u2019n\u0131n 359\/2. ve 353\/1-b-2. maddelerindeki d\u00fczenlemeler de g\u00f6zetilerek, esas hakk\u0131nda taleplerin her biri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tek tek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekirken, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 3. bendi d\u00fczeltilerek di\u011fer k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n aynen korunmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ve karar\u0131n infaz\u0131nda da teredd\u00fct olu\u015fmas\u0131na sebebiyet verecek \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<br>2-)Bozma nedenine g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu a\u015famada incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<br><br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da birinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 371. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, ikinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine bu a\u015famada yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, dosyan\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 16.03.2020 tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>3. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2018\/6874 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/2379 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen alacak davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm hakk\u0131nda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan istinaf incelemesi sonucunda; davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1877,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger-davalar-ve-emsal-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1167"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1167\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1896,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1167\/revisions\/1896"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1877"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}