{"id":1163,"date":"2020-06-16T19:18:05","date_gmt":"2020-06-16T16:18:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1163"},"modified":"2023-05-29T09:50:41","modified_gmt":"2023-05-29T09:50:41","slug":"zina-sebebiyle-bosanma-karari-diger-gerekceler","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/16\/zina-sebebiyle-bosanma-karari-diger-gerekceler\/","title":{"rendered":"Zina sebebiyle bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 &#8211; di\u011fer gerek\u00e7eler"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019\/6633 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/443 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi<br>DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise kat\u0131lma yoluyla; her iki dava sebebine dayal\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, kusur belirlemesi ve kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan tazminatlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilerek; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilmekle; duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 28.01.2020 g\u00fcn\u00fc duru\u015fmal\u0131 temyiz eden davac\u0131 &#8230; vekili Av. &#8230; ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf temyiz eden daval\u0131 &#8230; ile vekili Av. &#8230; geldiler. Gelenlerin konu\u015fmas\u0131 dinlendikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br>Davac\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle&nbsp;<mark>zina<\/mark>&nbsp;(TMK m. 161) kabul edilmedi\u011fi takdirde evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebeplerine (TMK m. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talebinde bulunmu\u015f mahkemece kad\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<mark>zina<\/mark>&nbsp;hukuki sebebine dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talebinin reddine, TMK 166\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ise davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan,&nbsp;<mark>zina<\/mark>&nbsp;hukuki sebebine dayal\u0131 olarak kabul edilmemesi, kusur belirlemesi ve tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmi\u015f olup Dairemizin 2016\/14658 esas ve 2018\/1859 karar say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131 ile \u201cYap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve toplanan delillerden, mahkemenin de kabul\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu \u00fczere; daval\u0131 erke\u011fin, evlilik devam ederken yabanc\u0131 uyruklu bir kad\u0131n ile ili\u015fkisinin oldu\u011funu, e\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 sadakatsiz davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak&nbsp;<mark>zinan\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;dava tarihinde devam etti\u011finin ve halen s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin kesin kan\u0131tlar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, kad\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<mark>zina<\/mark>&nbsp;davas\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015f ise de, gerek tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen ortak \u00e7ocuk Altay, gerek ise di\u011fer tan\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda daval\u0131 erke\u011fin dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe kadar ba\u015fka bir kad\u0131nla ya\u015famaya devam etti\u011fi davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya sunulan foto\u011fraflardan ve tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131yla anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<mark>zinaya<\/mark>&nbsp;dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131 ispatlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir. O halde davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<mark>zinaya<\/mark>&nbsp;dayal\u0131 (TMK m. 161) bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekirken, yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201d gerek\u00e7esi ile bozulmu\u015f, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re daval\u0131 erke\u011fin yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekli hale gelen kad\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kusur belirlemesi ve fer&#8217;ilerine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131 ile kad\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece kendisine y\u00fcklenen kusur ve tazminat miktarlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Mahkemece; bozma sonras\u0131nda \u201cDavan\u0131n her iki bo\u015fanma sebebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul\u00fc ile, TMK m. 161 ve 166\/1 maddeleri gere\u011fince daval\u0131n\u0131n subut bulan&nbsp;<mark>zinas\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;ve evlilik birli\u011finin g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f ve sadakatsizlik sebebiyle temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131\u201d nedeniyle taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle&nbsp;<mark>zina<\/mark>&nbsp;(TMK m. 161) kabul edilmedi\u011fi takdirde evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebeplerine (TMK m. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.&nbsp;<mark>Zina<\/mark>, mutlak bo\u015fanma sebebidir.&nbsp;<mark>Zina<\/mark>&nbsp;vak\u0131as\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde bo\u015fanma sebebi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.&nbsp;<mark>Zina<\/mark>, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde evlilik<br>birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuki sebebine kademeli olarak dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise;&nbsp;<mark>zinan\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;ispatlanmas\u0131 halinde, bu sebeple bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekir. B\u00f6yle bir durumda art\u0131k genel bo\u015fanma sebebinin \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fine bak\u0131lmaz ve bununla ilgili ayr\u0131ca bir h\u00fck\u00fcm olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 da gerekmez. Hal b\u00f6yleyken, mahkemece bozma ilam\u0131m\u0131za uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda sadece TMK.m.161 uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken TMK m. 166\/1 uyar\u0131nca da bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru olmay\u0131p bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<br>SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekli hale gelen kad\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 ve fer&#8217;lerine y\u00f6nelik kad\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, erke\u011fin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in takdir olunan 2.540,00 TL. vekalet \u00fccretinin Fatma&#8217;dan al\u0131n\u0131p H\u00fcsamettin&#8217;e verilmesine, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 28.01.2020 (Sal\u0131)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019\/6633 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/443 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile MahkemesiDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise kat\u0131lma yoluyla; her iki dava sebebine dayal\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, kusur belirlemesi ve kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1783,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bosanma-nafaka-mal-paylasimi-velayet"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1163"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1163\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1897,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1163\/revisions\/1897"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1783"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}