{"id":1101,"date":"2020-06-15T18:24:42","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T15:24:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1101"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:25:25","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:25:25","slug":"davacinin-emeklilik-tarihine-kadar-kidem-tazminati-hesap-edilir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/davacinin-emeklilik-tarihine-kadar-kidem-tazminati-hesap-edilir\/","title":{"rendered":"Davac\u0131n\u0131n emeklilik tarihine kadar k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesap edilir"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/24376 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3254 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><br>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>YARGITAY KARARI<br><br><br>A) Davac\u0131 isteminin \u00f6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n, 17.08.2005 &#8211; 01.12.2011 ile 01.05.2012 &#8211; 01.07.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda daval\u0131 \u015firkette i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fc ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n emeklilikle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n ise, i\u015fverence maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi nedeni ile ge\u00e7erli ve hakl\u0131 olarak kendisi taraf\u0131ndan sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<br>B)Daval\u0131 cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, davay\u0131 kabul etmediklerini, davac\u0131n\u0131n ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n emeklilikle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n ise istifa ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131ya&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;da \u00f6dendi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli bir hukuki nedene dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, iddia ve taleplerin yersiz oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<br>C)Yerel Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti:<br>Mahkemece, toplanan delillere ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkette 17.08.2005 &#8211; 01.12.2011 ile 01.05.2012 &#8211; 01.07.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemlerle ilgili olarak&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;talebi ile dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlendi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyeri dosyas\u0131 ile SGK dosyas\u0131n\u0131n getirildi\u011fi, dava konusu alacaklarla ilgili olarak bilirki\u015fiden rapor ald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f, davac\u0131 tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 17.08.2005 tarihinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 30.05.2011 tarihinde emekli oldu\u011fu, ancak emekli olduktan sonra 01.12.2011 tarihine kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etti\u011fi, 01.12.2011 tarihinde i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra 01.05.2012 tarihinde yeniden daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde tekrar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 01.07.2012 tarihine \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131aya ait i\u015fyerinde 17.08.2005 &#8211; 01.12.2011 ile 01.05.2012 &#8211; 01.07.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve en son maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n dosyada bulunan bordrolarda asgari \u00fccret olarak taahhuk ettirildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 vekilinin 01.12.2011 itibariyle davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretinin net 1.050,00 TL oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi, davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 A.B., kendisinin 2002 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 10 y\u0131l y\u00f6netici olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ilk d\u00f6nemlerde \u00fccretlerin elden \u00f6dendi\u011fini, son 5 y\u0131ldan beri de \u00fccretlerin asgari \u00fccret olan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bankaya yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra bakiyesinin ise bankadan \u00f6dendi\u011fini, davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 M.K.n\u0131n kendisinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda 2-3 ay \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin \u00fccretinin 800,00 TL&#8217;sinin bankadan 150,00 TL&#8217;sinin ise elden \u00f6dendi\u011fni beyan etti\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n hesap hareketleri incelendi\u011finde, hesb\u0131na her ay d\u00fczenli olarak maa\u015f\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra havale olarak \u00f6demeler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, &#8230; sendikas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen cevabi yaz\u0131da 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 emsal \u00fccretin net 1.250,00 TL br\u00fct 1.746,05 oldu\u011funun bildiridi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n unvan\u0131, fiilen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f ve emsal \u00fccret miktar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde davac\u0131n\u0131n en son br\u00fct maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n 1.466,69 TL olarak kabul edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 vekilinin davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde; 17.08.2005 tarihinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 30.05.2011 tarihinde emekli oldu\u011funu, ancak emekli olduktan sonra 01.12.2011 tarihine kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etti\u011fini, 01.12.2011 tarihinde babas\u0131n\u0131n ameliyat olmas\u0131 ve bak\u0131ma muhta\u00e7 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra 01.05.2012 tarihinde i\u015fe d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve 01.07.2012 tarihine \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 01.12.2011 tarihine kadar net 1.050,00 TL \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 01.05.2012 tarihinde i\u015fe ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00fccretinin 1.000,00 TL&#8217;ye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bu nedenle feshedildi\u011fini, davac\u0131ya emekli oldu\u011fu d\u00f6neme kadar olan hizmet s\u00fcresine ili\u015fkin tazminat\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi, her ne kadar daval\u0131 vekili davac\u0131n\u0131n birinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015famas\u0131n\u0131n emeklilik nedeniyle sona erdi\u011fini ve bu d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin olarak davac\u0131ya net 4.284,69 TL&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;\u00f6demesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n ise davac\u0131n\u0131n istifas\u0131 nedeni ile sona erdi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n istifaya ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na<\/mark>&nbsp;hak kazanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f ise de, daval\u0131ya ait hesap hareketleri incelendi\u011finde davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretlerinin ve&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;taahkukunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 2011 May\u0131s ay\u0131na ait maa\u015f\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;\u00f6denmedi\u011fi, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00fccretinde eksilme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeni ile hakl\u0131 sebeple feshedildi\u011fi, bu hale g\u00f6re, atanan bilirki\u015finin&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;y\u00f6ntemi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan usul ve yasaya uygun 12.05.2016 tarihli maddi&nbsp;<mark>hesaplamalar<\/mark>&nbsp;do\u011frultusunda, davac\u0131n\u0131n 15.07.2015 tarihli \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi de dikkate al\u0131narak, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>D)Temyiz:<br>Karar s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>E)Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1- Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>2- Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta,&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;bak\u0131m\u0131ndan;<br>Dava dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n 30\/05\/2011 tarihinde emeklilik gerek\u00e7esi ile i\u015f aktinin sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 01\/06\/2011 tarihinden itibaren \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etti\u011fi, 01\/12\/2011 tarihinde davac\u0131n\u0131n babas\u0131n\u0131n ameliyat ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n babas\u0131na bakma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeni ile i\u015ften 01\/12\/2011 tarihinde ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 01\/05\/2012 tarihinde daval\u0131 nezdinde yeniden i\u015fe ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ama, davac\u0131n\u0131n maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile 01\/07\/2012 tarihinde davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f aktini hakl\u0131 nedenle sonland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<br>Cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n emeklilik ile sona erdi\u011fi ve&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;\u00f6dendi\u011fi, ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n 21\/07\/2012 tarihinde istifa ile sona erdi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na<\/mark>&nbsp;hak kazanamayaca\u011f\u0131 savunulmu\u015ftur.<br><strong>Davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f aktinin 30\/05\/2011 tarihinde emeklilik nedeni ile sona erdi\u011fi hususun da taraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<br>May\u0131s \/ 2011 ay\u0131 bordrosunda&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>&nbsp;tahakkuku mevcuttur.<\/strong><br>Davac\u0131n\u0131n 01\/12\/2011 tarihinde babas\u0131na bakmak i\u00e7in ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 Yasa kapsam\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7inin hakl\u0131 fesih nedenleri aras\u0131nda belirtilmemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131n\u0131n 01\/12\/2011 tarihinde i\u015f aktini haks\u0131z feshetti\u011fi kabul edilmeli ve 01\/06\/2011-01\/12\/2011 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki hizmet s\u00fcresi,&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na<\/mark>&nbsp;esas s\u00fcreye eklenmemelidir.<br>01\/05\/2012-01\/07\/2012 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki hizmet s\u00fcresi ise 1 y\u0131ldan az oldu\u011fundan davac\u0131n\u0131n bu d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na<\/mark>&nbsp;hak kazanmas\u0131 zaten m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayacakt\u0131r.<br><strong>A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenler ile davac\u0131n\u0131n sadece emeklilik tarihine kadar olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi, emeklilik tarihi i\u00e7in tespit edilecek \u00fccreti \u00fczerinden hesaplanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<br><\/strong>F)SONU\u00c7:<br>Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi halinde ilgilisine iadesine, 27\/02\/2020 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/24376 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3254 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: YARGITAY KARARI A) Davac\u0131 isteminin \u00f6zeti:Davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n, 17.08.2005 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1983,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-isci-tazminatlari-ve-alacaklari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1101"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1101\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1999,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1101\/revisions\/1999"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1983"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}