{"id":1099,"date":"2020-06-15T18:22:22","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T15:22:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1099"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:25:49","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:25:49","slug":"kidem-tazminatinda-fesih-tarihinin-karara-yazilmasi-gerekir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/kidem-tazminatinda-fesih-tarihinin-karara-yazilmasi-gerekir\/","title":{"rendered":"K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131nda fesih tarihinin karara yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/602 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3205 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lardan T.C. &#8230; vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>YARGITAY KARARI<br><br>A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n 20.03.2008-28.08.2013 tarihleri aras\u0131nda daval\u0131 T.C. &#8230;.Belediyesi Park ve Bah\u00e7eler M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;ne ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ancak ta\u015feron firmalar nezdinde bah\u00e7\u0131van ve temizlik g\u00f6revlisi olarak, en son 1.140,00 TL \u00fccret ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f akdinin di\u011fer daval\u0131 &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan haks\u0131z olarak feshedildi\u011fini, daval\u0131lar aras\u0131nda as\u0131l i\u015fveren-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n kadrolu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilere nazaran \u00fccretinde 1.000,00 TL&#8217;yi a\u015fk\u0131n fark oldu\u011funu ve bu nedenle \u00fccret fark\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011fini, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresince y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerini kullanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, yine asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7 \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, dini ve milli bayramlarda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini iddia ederek; daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flemin tespitine, davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7tan itibaren as\u0131l i\u015fveren T.C. &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7isi say\u0131lmas\u0131na,&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>, ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla mesai \u00fccreti, genel tatil \u00fccreti, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti, fark \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 ve asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<br>B) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 &#8230; \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n 15.01.2013-28.08.2013 tarihleri aras\u0131nda, asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi (73,40 TL) hari\u00e7 1.064,88 TL net \u00fccretle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer daval\u0131 ile aralar\u0131nda as\u0131l i\u015fveren- alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, iddialar\u0131n as\u0131ls\u0131z oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini doldurmamas\u0131 nedeniyle y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131na da hak kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 T.C. Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Belediyesi \u00f6zetle, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini, daval\u0131 idarede davac\u0131n\u0131n kayd\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendi iste\u011fiyle i\u015ften ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n ihaleyi alan \u015firketler nezdinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla mesai taleplerinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>C) Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar taraflar\u0131n temyizi \u00fczerine, Dairemizce \u00f6zetle ve sonu\u00e7 olarak;<br>\u201c1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillere karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, daval\u0131lar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>2-Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Dosyada m\u00fcbrez davac\u0131ya ait \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131 ve banka kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131 hari\u00e7 di\u011fer aylar\u0131na ait \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131nda asgari ge\u00e7im indirimlerinin tahakkuk ettirildi\u011fi ve bordro tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n bankaya aynen yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alaca\u011f\u0131nda, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar hesap yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yerinde isede, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sadece nisan ay\u0131na ait asgari ge\u00e7im indiriminin hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekirken, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm aylar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;yap\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi raporuna itibar edilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<br>3-Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde talep etti\u011fi alacaklar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan 3 defa \u0131slah talebinde bulunarak her bir \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinde farkl\u0131 bir alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u0131slah etmi\u015ftir. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019nun 176\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re, ayn\u0131 davada sadece bir kez \u0131slah yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilir. Davac\u0131 bu hakk\u0131n\u0131, 26\/02\/2014 tarihli \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 talepleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ilk \u0131slaha de\u011fer verilip sonraki \u0131slah taleplerinin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.<br>4-3 numaral\u0131 bentteki bozma gerek\u00e7esi do\u011frultusunda, fazla mesai, genel tatil ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131nda, sadece dava dilek\u00e7esi ile istenen miktarlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d gerek\u00e7eleriyle bozulmu\u015ftur.<br>Mahkemece bozmaya uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>D) Temyiz:<br>Karar\u0131, davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lardan T.C. &#8230; vekilleri temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<br>E) Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillere karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 &#8230; ve davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br><strong>2-Davada birden fazla daval\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ve daval\u0131lar h\u00fckmedilen alacak kalemleri ile har\u00e7 ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlu olduklar\u0131 halde, h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan har\u00e7 ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen tahsiline h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekirken, h\u00fck\u00fcmde, infazda teredd\u00fcte yol a\u00e7acak \u015fekilde hangi daval\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan sadece \u201cdaval\u0131dan\u201d denilerek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 ve&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131nda<\/mark>&nbsp;fesih tarihinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131lmamas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup bozma sebebi ise de; bu yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn HMK.nun ge\u00e7ici 3\/2. maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile HUMK 438\/7. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilerek onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><br>F)Sonu\u00e7:<br>Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n,&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na<\/mark>&nbsp;ili\u015fkin 1 numaral\u0131 bendinin \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak yerine;<br>\u201c1-Hesaplanan 8.028,33TL net&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih tarihi olan 28.08.2013 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek mevduata uygulanan en y\u00fcksek faiz oran\u0131 ile birlikte<br>daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine, fazlaya ili\u015fkin talebin reddine,\u201d bendinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na,<br>H\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n, 7 ve 8 numaral\u0131 bentlerindeki \u201cdaval\u0131dan\u201d s\u00f6zc\u00fcklerinin \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak yerlerine ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 \u201cdaval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen\u201d s\u00f6zc\u00fcklerinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu \u015fekilde D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu\u2019 nun 28.09.2018 tarih ve 2018\/2 E. 2018\/8 K. say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130BK. uyar\u0131nca onama harc\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 27.02.2020 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/602 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3205 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lardan T.C. &#8230; vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: YARGITAY KARARI A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1990,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-hukuku"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1099"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1099\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2000,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1099\/revisions\/2000"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}