{"id":1097,"date":"2020-06-15T18:20:09","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T15:20:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1097"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:26:14","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:26:14","slug":"davada-emsal-dava-dosyasinin-dikkate-alinmasi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/davada-emsal-dava-dosyasinin-dikkate-alinmasi\/","title":{"rendered":"Davada emsal dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/470 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3258 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><br>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraflar vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>YARGITAY KARARI<br><br>A) Davac\u0131 isteminin \u00f6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 \u015firkette 18\/03\/2010 tarihinden itibaren kesintisiz olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, haftal\u0131k ve g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcrelerinden fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 fazla mesai genel tatil \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmemesi ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerinin kulland\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini hakl\u0131 nedenle fesih ettiklerini, bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti, fazla mesai \u00fccreti, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram genel tatil \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<br>B)Daval\u0131 cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili firman\u0131n 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131 ge\u00e7irmi\u015f bulundu\u011fu genel tefti\u015f i\u00e7inde 80.000 TL. civar\u0131nda mal kayb\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine davac\u0131 ve 5 arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n istifa ettiklerini, iddia ve taleplerin yersiz oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<br>C)Yerel Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti:<br>Mahkemece, toplanan delillere ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, Mahkeme\u2019nin 24\/12\/2015 tarihli karar\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131 vekili temyizi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/6209 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile fazla mesai \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeniden ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme yap\u0131lmak suretiyle bozuldu\u011fu, bozma ilam\u0131na uyuldu\u011fu, bozma do\u011frultusunda &#8230;. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2014\/92 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyan\u0131n celbedildi\u011fi, taraf vekillerine, davac\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131nda dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n hangi tarih aral\u0131klar\u0131nda hangi g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ve hangi \u015fubelerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, \u015fubelerdeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma g\u00fcn ve saatleri konusunda beyanda bulunmak \u00fczere s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi ve taraflarca verilen beyan dilek\u00e7esinden sonra dosya hesap bilirki\u015fine tevdii ile rapor ald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131, emsal \u00fccret ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015f nazara al\u0131narak son net \u00fccretinin 975 TL oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi fazla mesai ve ulusal bayram -genel tatil \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmemesi, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin haklar\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle fesih edildi\u011fi, 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 24\/II -e maddesinde \u00fccretin kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri veya s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u00f6denmemesi halinde i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f aktini hakl\u0131 olarak fesih edebilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, fazla mesai ve ulusal bayram- genel tatil \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 geni\u015f anlamda \u00fccret kavram\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131 ve bilirki\u015fi raporundan davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla mesai ve ulusal bayram &#8211; genel tatil alaca\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin tamam\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00fccretinin de \u00f6denmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015f aktini fesih eden davac\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na<\/mark>&nbsp;hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131, dinlenen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015f yerinde haftal\u0131k 45 saati a\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatillerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, fazla mesai ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatillerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan g\u00fcnlere ait \u00fccretinin \u00f6dendi\u011finin daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla mesai ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatillerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnlere ait \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 2 haftal\u0131k y\u0131ll\u0131k izinini kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a imzal\u0131 izin defteri veya e\u015f de\u011fer bir belge ile kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 gerekmekte olup, daval\u0131 yanca davac\u0131n\u0131n imzas\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin belgesi sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi gibi 14 g\u00fcnl\u00fck y\u0131ll\u0131k izin alaca\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, dinlenen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n, dini bayramlardan \u00f6nce 14-15 g\u00fcn aral\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ramazan aylar\u0131nda iki hafta, kurban bayram\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde 10 g\u00fcn haftada 7 g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak bu g\u00fcnlere ili\u015fkin \u00f6demelerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fverence ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnlere ait hafta tatili \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi, usul\u00fcne uygun d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan 14.09.2015 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporu ve bozma ilam\u0131ndan sonra al\u0131nan 10.10.2019 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131na itibar edildi\u011fi (<mark>k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131<\/mark>, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram genel tatil ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izin alaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 14.09.2015 tarihli rapora itibar edildi\u011fi, fazla mesai \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise 10.10.2019 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporuna itibar edildi\u011fi), bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131, dava ve \u0131slah dilek\u00e7eleri do\u011frultusunda ( Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 gere\u011fi davac\u0131n\u0131n izinli, raporlu vs olabilece\u011fi g\u00fcnler g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak ve tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile sonuca gidildi\u011finden fazla mesai, hafta tatili ve ulusal bayram genel tatil alacaklar\u0131ndan takdiren %40 indirim uygulamak suretiyle) h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>D)Temyiz:<br>Karar s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili ve daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>E)Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda dava tarihinin 24\/01\/2014 yerine 16\/02\/2015 \u015feklinde yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 mahallinde d\u00fczeltilebilir maddi hata kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<br>2-Mahkeme\u2019nin ilk karar\u0131, daval\u0131 temyizi \u00fczerine, Dairemizin 2016\/6209 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131 ile \u201c Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, fazla mesai \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan; Her 2 davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 daval\u0131 ile daval\u0131d\u0131r. Daval\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131na g\u00f6re fazla mesai \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 s\u00fcbut bulmamaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fi, bir daval\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131na taraf\u0131ndan \u201creyon sorumlusu\u201d, di\u011fer bir daval\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131na taraf\u0131ndan \u201csat\u0131\u015f dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131\u201d olarak belirtili\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise reyon \u015fefi olarak belirtmi\u015ftir. Dairemizin birlikte incelenen 2015\/36040 Esas (&#8230; \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi 2014\/92 Esas) say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fi \u201csat\u0131\u015f dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 sonra kasiyer\u201d olarak belirtilmi\u015f, gene Dairemizin birlikte incelenen 2015\/36041 Esas (&#8230; \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi 2014\/94 Esas) say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131ndaki davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fi \u201csat\u0131\u015f dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 sonra reyon \u015fefi\u201d olarak belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bahsedilen 2 dosya celbedilmeli, eldeki dosya ile birlikte bu 2 dosya davac\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n hangi tarih aral\u0131klar\u0131nda hangi g\u00f6revleri yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ve hangi tarih aral\u0131klar\u0131nda hangi \u015fubelerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, \u015fubelerdeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma g\u00fcn ve saatlerinin ayn\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 de\u011filse hangi tarihler itibari ile nas\u0131l farkl\u0131l\u0131klar oldu\u011fu, taraflardan sorulup, gerekir ise eldeki dosyada dinlenen tan\u0131klar yeniden dinlenerek netle\u015ftirilip, Dairemizin 2015\/36041 Esas ve 2015\/36040 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyalar ile birlikte eldeki dosya ayn\u0131 bilirki\u015fiye tevdi edilerek ve bahsedilen di\u011fer dosyalardaki delillerin eldeki dosyaya uygunlu\u011fu ve etkisi de eldeki dosyadaki deliller ile birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek fazla mesai \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olumlu ya da olumsuz bir sonuca gidilmelidir. Tan\u0131klara g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak fazla mesai&nbsp;<mark>hesaplamas\u0131n\u0131n<\/mark>&nbsp;mevcudiyetinde, sadece tan\u0131klar\u0131n davac\u0131 ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sonucu bildikleri d\u00f6nem bak\u0131m\u0131ndan&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;yap\u0131labilece\u011fi de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d gerek\u00e7esi ile bozulmu\u015ftur.<br><strong>Bozma sonras\u0131nda, bozma ilam\u0131nda bahsedilen dosyalardan bozma sonras\u0131 h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda bahsedilmekle birlikte bozma gerekleri yerine getirilmeksizin bir&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;yap\u0131larak sonuca gidilmi\u015ftir.<br>Dairemizin 2016\/6209 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131nda iki emsal dosyadan bahsedilerek, o iki emsal dosyan\u0131n celbedilmesi, bu iki emsal dosyan\u0131n davac\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n, yani belirtilen emsal dosyalar\u0131n davac\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n, hangi d\u00f6nemlerde hangi \u015fubelerde, hangi g\u00f6revlerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 hususudur.<br>Dairemizin 2016\/6209 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131nda tespiti gerekti\u011fi belirtilen ba\u015fka hususlar ve i\u015flemler bulundu\u011fu da g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<br>Dairemizin 2016\/6209 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131 gereklerinin hemen hi\u00e7 biri yerine getirilmeksizin sonuca gidilmesi hatal\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><br><br>F) SONU\u00c7:<br>Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu a\u015famada incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 27\/02\/2020 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/470 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3258 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraflar vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: YARGITAY KARARI A) Davac\u0131 isteminin \u00f6zeti:Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1969,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-isci-tazminatlari-ve-alacaklari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1097"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2001,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions\/2001"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}