Belirsiz i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktayken, i\u015f akdihaks\u0131z olarak feshedilen i\u015f\u00e7i, bu i\u015fyerinde en az 30 i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131 ve bu i\u015f\u00e7i de bu i\u015fyerinde en az 6 ayd\u0131r \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla i\u015fe iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130\u015fe iade davas\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi \u00f6nce arabuluculuk yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130\u015fe iade davas\u0131 bir tespit davas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu davada i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f akdinin feshinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu ve bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en (4 ay) \u00fccretinin ve i\u015fe iadenin mahkeme karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemesi halinde en az 4 ayl\u0131k en fazla 8 ayl\u0131k \u00fccret \u00fczerinden tazminat\u0131n tespiti istenir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davas\u0131 kabul edilen i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fe kabul edilmezse bu tazmainatlar\u0131 ile di\u011fer tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131 aayr\u0131 bir ba\u015fvuru ve dava ile talep eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130\u015fe kabul edilen i\u015f\u00e7i ise sadece 4 ayl\u0131k bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en \u00fccretini al\u0131r. Bu 4 ay\u0131n sigorta primi de i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130\u015eE \u0130ADE DAVASI KANUN MADDELER\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 20. ve 21. maddelerinde \u015fu \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Fesih bildirimine itiraz ve usul\u00fc \u0130\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131l\u0131rsa, pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6denen bildirim s\u00fcresine ait \u00fccret ile k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kra h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak \u00f6demeden mahsup edilir. \u0130\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmayan i\u015f\u00e7iye bildirim s\u00fcresi verilmemi\u015f veya bildirim s\u00fcresine ait \u00fccret pe\u015fin \u00f6denmemi\u015fse, bu s\u00fcrelere ait \u00fccret tutar\u0131 ayr\u0131ca \u00f6denir. \u0130\u015eE \u0130ADE DAVASINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N B\u0130R EMSAL KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/19395 E. , 2020\/3059 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Belirsiz i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktayken, i\u015f akdihaks\u0131z olarak feshedilen i\u015f\u00e7i, bu i\u015fyerinde en az 30 i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131 ve bu i\u015f\u00e7i de bu i\u015fyerinde en az 6 ayd\u0131r \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla i\u015fe iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir. \u0130\u015fe iade davas\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi \u00f6nce arabuluculuk yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 zorunludur. \u0130\u015fe iade davas\u0131 bir tespit davas\u0131d\u0131r. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1961,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-hukuku"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1087"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1087\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2006,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1087\/revisions\/2006"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1961"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Madde 20 \u2013<\/strong> (De\u011fi\u015fik birinci f\u0131kra: 12\/10\/2017-7036\/11 md.) \u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi feshedilen i\u015f\u00e7i, fesih bildiriminde sebep g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fi veya g\u00f6sterilen sebebin ge\u00e7erli bir sebep olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile fesih bildiriminin tebli\u011fi tarihinden itibaren bir ay i\u00e7inde i\u015fe iade talebiyle, \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca arabulucuya ba\u015fvurmak zorundad\u0131r. Arabuluculuk
faaliyeti sonunda anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lamamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, son tutana\u011f\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren, iki hafta i\u00e7inde i\u015f mahkemesinde dava a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Taraflar anla\u015f\u0131rlarsa uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ayn\u0131 s\u00fcrede i\u015f
mahkemesi yerine \u00f6zel hakeme de g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclebilir. Arabulucuya ba\u015fvurmaks\u0131z\u0131n do\u011frudan dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddi h\u00e2linde ret karar\u0131 taraflara resen tebli\u011f edilir. Kesinle\u015fen ret karar\u0131n\u0131n da resen tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7inde arabulucuya ba\u015fvurulabilir.
Feshin ge\u00e7erli bir sebebe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fverene aittir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i, feshin ba\u015fka bir sebebe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi takdirde, bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispatla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.
(De\u011fi\u015fik \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kra: 12\/10\/2017-7036\/11 md.) Dava ivedilikle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.
Mahkemece verilen karar hakk\u0131nda istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi ivedilikle ve kesin olarak karar verir.
(\u0130ptal d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kra: Anayasa Mahkemesinin 19\/10\/2005 tarihli ve E.:2003\/66, K.:2005\/72 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile.)
Ge\u00e7ersiz sebeple yap\u0131lan feshin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131
Madde 21 –<\/strong> \u0130\u015fverence ge\u00e7erli sebep g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fi veya g\u00f6sterilen sebebin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkemece veya \u00f6zel hakem taraf\u0131ndan tespit edilerek feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine karar verildi\u011finde, i\u015fveren, i\u015f\u00e7iyi bir ay i\u00e7inde i\u015fe ba\u015flatmak zorundad\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7iyi ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine i\u015fveren bir ay i\u00e7inde i\u015fe ba\u015flatmaz ise, i\u015f\u00e7iye en az d\u00f6rt ayl\u0131k ve en \u00e7ok sekiz ayl\u0131k \u00fccreti tutar\u0131nda tazminat \u00f6demekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olur.
Mahkeme veya \u00f6zel hakem feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine karar verdi\u011finde, i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmamas\u0131 halinde \u00f6denecek tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131 da belirler.
Karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7in i\u015f\u00e7iye en \u00e7ok d\u00f6rt aya kadar do\u011fmu\u015f bulunan \u00fccret ve di\u011fer haklar\u0131 \u00f6denir.
(Ek f\u0131kra: 12\/10\/2017-7036\/12 md.) Mahkeme veya \u00f6zel hakem, ikinci f\u0131krada
d\u00fczenlenen tazminat ile \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131krada d\u00fczenlenen \u00fccret ve di\u011fer haklar\u0131, dava tarihindeki \u00fccreti esas alarak parasal olarak belirler.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130\u015f\u00e7i kesinle\u015fen mahkeme veya \u00f6zel hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren on i\u015fg\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7inde i\u015fe ba\u015flamak i\u00e7in i\u015fverene ba\u015fvuruda bulunmak zorundad\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuruda bulunmaz ise, i\u015fverence yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan fesih ge\u00e7erli bir fesih say\u0131l\u0131r ve i\u015fveren sadece bunun hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ile sorumlu olur.
(Ek f\u0131kra: 12\/10\/2017-7036\/12 md.) Arabuluculuk faaliyeti sonunda taraflar\u0131n, i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda anla\u015fmalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde;
a) \u0130\u015fe ba\u015flatma tarihini,
b) \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131krada d\u00fczenlenen \u00fccret ve di\u011fer haklar\u0131n parasal miktar\u0131n\u0131,
c) \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda ikinci f\u0131krada d\u00fczenlenen tazminat\u0131n parasal miktar\u0131n\u0131, belirlemeleri zorunludur. Aksi takdirde anla\u015fma sa\u011flanamam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve son tutanak buna g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlenir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan tarihte i\u015fe ba\u015flamamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde fesih ge\u00e7erli h\u00e2le gelir ve i\u015fveren sadece bunun hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ile sorumlu olur.
Bu maddenin birinci, ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kra h\u00fck\u00fcmleri s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler ile hi\u00e7bir suretle de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez; aksi y\u00f6nde s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:
YARGITAY KARARI
A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:
Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 21.11.2007 – 08.03.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fteri temsilcisi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 bir neden olmaks\u0131z\u0131n feshedilmesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan i\u015fe iade davas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili lehine sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Yarg\u0131tay 9. HD.’nin karar\u0131 ile kesinle\u015fti\u011fini, mahkeme ilam\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 18.11.2013 tarihinde i\u015fe iade ba\u015fvurusu yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7iye daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131 ile bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n eksik olarak hesaplan\u0131p \u00f6dendi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi a\u015famas\u0131nda k\u0131dem ve \u0130hbar tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemdeki son \u00fccretinin 1.500,00-TL oldu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca i\u015fyerinde yemek ve servis hizmetinin bulundu\u011funu, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerine dair \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini iddia ederek, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131<\/mark>, bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 fark\u0131, i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131 fark\u0131 ile y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.
B) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Daval\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fe iade karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fe iade ba\u015fvurusunu reddederek i\u015f\u00e7inin hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn tazminatlar\u0131n kendisine \u00f6dendi\u011fini, eksik bir \u00f6demenin s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
C) Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Mahkeme, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayanarak davac\u0131n\u0131n hizmet s\u00fcresinin 4 y\u0131l 3 ay 6 g\u00fcn olup…. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinin i\u015fe iadeye ili\u015fkin 2012\/219 E., 2012\/806 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 gere\u011fince tespit edilen 4 ayl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f gibi say\u0131lan s\u00fcrenin de eklenmesi ile toplam hizmet s\u00fcresinin 4 y\u0131l 7 ay 6 g\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ; davac\u0131n\u0131n talep edebilece\u011fi k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 , ihbar tazminat\u0131<\/mark>, 4 ayl\u0131k bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccreti, i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131 ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin alacaklar\u0131 denetime elveri\u015fli bilirki\u015fi Av Esra Yavuz’un 22\/12\/2015 tarihli raporu ile daha \u00f6nce i\u015fverence yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelere mahsup edilerek hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131, hesaplanan alacaklar da \u00f6deme olgusu daval\u0131 yanca yaz\u0131l\u0131 delillerle ispat edilemedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir.
D) Temyiz:
Karar\u0131 daval\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.
E) Gerek\u00e7e:
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.
2-6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.’un 31. maddesinde, “H\u00e2kim, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, madd\u00ee veya hukuk\u00ee a\u00e7\u0131dan belirsiz yahut \u00e7eli\u015fkili g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar hakk\u0131nda, taraflara a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131rabilir; soru sorabilir; delil g\u00f6sterilmesini isteyebilir” kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda taraf dilek\u00e7esinde vak\u0131adan bahsetmi\u015f, baz\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015f olabilir. Ancak bu vak\u0131alar, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ve bulunulan talepler a\u00e7\u0131k olmayabilir. Hakimin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6zmesi ve do\u011fru karar verebilmesi i\u00e7in, taraflar\u0131n ne dediklerini tam olarak \u00f6\u011frenip bilmesi gerekir. \u0130ddia ve savunman\u0131n belirsiz veya \u00e7eli\u015fkili olmas\u0131 durumunda h\u00e2kime verilen bu yetki, h\u00e2kim (mahkeme) bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 zamanda bir \u00f6devdir.
Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde, davac\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fen i\u015fe iade karar\u0131 \u00fczerine s\u00fcresi i\u00e7in i\u015fe iade ba\u015fvurusu yapmas\u0131n\u0131 takiben daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin, davac\u0131y\u0131 i\u015fe ba\u015flatmamay\u0131 tercih ederek i\u015f\u00e7inin bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131n\u0131 ve bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6dedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak bu alacaklar\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015f, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131na raporda da ise 8.602,25 TL. miktarl\u0131 i\u015fe iade \u00f6demesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren dekonttan bahsedilmi\u015ftir.<\/strong>
Yine h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan 6 g\u00fcnl\u00fck izin alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak daval\u0131 \u00f6deme savunmas\u0131 yap\u0131p bu savunmay\u0131 ispat i\u00e7in imzas\u0131z bordroyu dosyaya ibraz etmi\u015ftir.
Mahkemenin dava dilek\u00e7esinde bahsedilen i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131 ve bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u00ee \u00f6demenin ne kadar oldu\u011fu, 8.602,25 TL. miktarl\u0131 i\u015fe iade \u00f6demesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren dekonttaki \u00f6demenin yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131ld\u0131ysa hangi kalemlere ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, yine 6 g\u00fcnl\u00fck izin \u00f6demesine ili\u015fkin imzas\u0131z bordro kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131ya veya bankaya \u00f6denip \u00f6denmedi\u011fi hususlar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmadan sonuca gitmesi isabetsizdir.<\/strong>
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; hakimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00f6devi yerine getirilmeden ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k teredd\u00fcts\u00fcz \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmadan karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.
F) Sonu\u00e7:
Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine 26.02.2020 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"