{"id":1079,"date":"2020-06-15T17:38:35","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T14:38:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1079"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:39:30","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:39:30","slug":"fazla-calisma-ucretinin-hesaplanmasi-yillik-izin-ucreti-alacaginin-tespiti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/fazla-calisma-ucretinin-hesaplanmasi-yillik-izin-ucreti-alacaginin-tespiti\/","title":{"rendered":"Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretinin hesaplanmas\u0131 &#8211; Y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/26958 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1531 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<br>DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK<br><br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<br><br>Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fverene ait i\u015fyerinde 19.06.2006-21.04.2014 tarihleri aras\u0131nda elektrik i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak ve en son ayl\u0131k net 1.450,00 TL \u00fccret kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, her g\u00fcn 07.30-18.00 saatleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 ile y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi nedeni ile davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f hakl\u0131 sebeple feshedildi\u011fini, k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti,&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti<\/mark>, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsilini; kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n ise reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili, i\u015f s\u00f6zlemesinin davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil, devams\u0131zl\u0131k hakl\u0131 sebebine istinaden daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan feshedildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n reddi ile ihbar tazminat\u0131 talebini i\u00e7eren kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Mahkemece, toplanan deliller ve bilirki\u015fi raporu do\u011frultusunda davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n ise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Temyiz Ba\u015fvurusu:<br>Karar\u0131, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<br>Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br><strong>2-Taraflar aras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti<\/mark>&nbsp;ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretine hak kazan\u0131p kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusudur.<br>Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde, her g\u00fcn 07:30-18:00 saatleri aras\u0131nda, ayr\u0131ca ulusal bayram ve genel tatil g\u00fcnlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f, Mahkemece bilirki\u015fi raporunda hesaplanan&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti<\/mark>&nbsp;h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. H\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n haftan\u0131n 6 g\u00fcn\u00fc 07:30- 17:00 saatleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 durumunda, g\u00fcnde 8,5 saat \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak (8,5-7,5=) 1 saat fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, haftal\u0131k fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin 6 saat, y\u0131ll\u0131k fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin ise 312 oldu\u011fu, b\u00f6ylece y\u0131ll\u0131k fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin 270 saati ge\u00e7ti\u011fi kabul edilerek, 270 saat&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti<\/mark>&nbsp;hesaplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda dinlenen davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131ndan birisi husumetli tan\u0131k olup, di\u011ferinin ise 2012 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar davac\u0131 ile birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmektedir. Tan\u0131klardan birinin husumetli oldu\u011fu, di\u011ferinin beyan\u0131na ise ancak davac\u0131 ile birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak itibar edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.<br>Kabule g\u00f6re de, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin haftal\u0131k yerine g\u00fcnl\u00fck olarak hesaplanmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup, karar\u0131n bu sebeple de bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><br>3-Taraflar aras\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 noktas\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k vard\u0131r.<br><strong>6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 31. maddesinde h\u00e2kim, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, maddi veya hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan belirsiz yahut \u00e7eli\u015fkili g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar hakk\u0131nda, taraflara a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131rabilir, soru sorabilir, delil g\u00f6sterilmesini isteyebilir \u015feklinde d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131larak hakime yarg\u0131lama sonunda do\u011fruya ula\u015fma g\u00f6revini y\u00fcklemi\u015ftir.<\/strong> Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 141. maddesine g\u00f6re, yarg\u0131 basit, \u00e7abuk ve ucuz ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmelidir. Devlet yarg\u0131n\u0131n basit, ucuz ve \u00e7abuk ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in gerekli d\u00fczenlemeleri yapmak durumundad\u0131r. Zira hakk\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ve korunmas\u0131ndaki gecikmeler, hukuk devleti ilkesi ile uyumlu de\u011fildir, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihl\u00e2l eder. Bu sebeple yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ula\u015f\u0131lacak h\u00fck\u00fcm, do\u011fru, gecikmemi\u015f ve kendisinden beklenen etkiyi g\u00f6steren bir niteli\u011fe sahip olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bundan dolay\u0131 belirsiz vak\u0131alar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, eksikliklerin h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan i\u015faret edilerek taraflarca giderilerek yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesine ili\u015fkin h\u00e2kimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. Usul hukukunda bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn anlam\u0131, do\u011fru h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu hususta yap\u0131lacak bir inceleme i\u00e7inse, taraflar\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131 eksiksiz ve zaman, yer gibi somut unsurlar\u0131yla tam bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k i\u00e7inde yarg\u0131lamaya getirmeleri gerekmektedir.<br><strong>Somut olayda davac\u0131 vekili s\u00fcre belirtmeksizin davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin haklar\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n toplam hizmet s\u00fcresince 7 y\u0131ll\u0131k d\u00f6nemde hi\u00e7 izin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br>Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n davay\u0131 somutla\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fc (HMK m.194), hakimin de davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (HMK m. 31) bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak, davac\u0131n\u0131n 7 y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi boyunca hi\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullanmamas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ters oldu\u011fundan, davac\u0131n\u0131n beyan\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilip, sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><br>SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerden BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 04.02.2020 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/26958 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1531 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f MahkemesiDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1958,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-hukuku"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1079"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2011,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079\/revisions\/2011"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}