{"id":1077,"date":"2020-06-15T17:32:17","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T14:32:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1077"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:39:47","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:39:47","slug":"baglanan-gelirlerin-ilk-pesin-sermaye-degerlerinin-rucuya-tabi-kisimlarinin-indirilerek-tazminatin-belirlenmesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/baglanan-gelirlerin-ilk-pesin-sermaye-degerlerinin-rucuya-tabi-kisimlarinin-indirilerek-tazminatin-belirlenmesi\/","title":{"rendered":"Ba\u011flanan gelirlerin ilk pe\u015fin sermaye de\u011ferlerinin r\u00fccuya tabi k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n indirilerek tazminat\u0131n belirlenmesi"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>21. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019\/4074 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/494 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi &#8230; Hukuk Dairesi<br>\u0130LK DERECE<br>MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<br><br>K A R A R<br>A) Davac\u0131 \u0130stemi;<br>Davac\u0131lar dava dilek\u00e7esi ve \u0131slahla fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere e\u015f i\u00e7in 65.571,25 TL Maddi, 150.000,00 TL Manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in, 8.844,85 TL maddi, 125.000,00 TL manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in 10.234,48 TL maddi, 125.000,00 TL manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in 17.745,17 TL Maddi, 125.000,00 TL manevi, anne ve baba i\u00e7in 50.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi, karde\u015fler i\u00e7in 25.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<br>B) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131;<br>Daval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<br>C) \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi Karar\u0131:<br>\u0130lk derece mahkemesince \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n maddi tazminat istemlerinin kabul\u00fcne, e\u015f lehine 49.071,25 TL maddi, 65.000,00 TL manevi, \u00e7ocuklar lehine 40.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi, anne ve baba lehine 20.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi, karde\u015fler lehine 7.500,00&#8217;er TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar<br>D) B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Karar\u0131:<br>\u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 7. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nce taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n HMK&#8217;nun 353\/1-b\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>E) Temyiz Nedenleri:<br>Davac\u0131lar temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinde \u00f6zetle kusur oranlar\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 tespit edildi\u011fini, s\u00fcreklilik arazeden&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretinin<\/mark>&nbsp;maddi zarar hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, davac\u0131 e\u015fin evlenme ihtimali olmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n %1 oran\u0131nda evlenme ihtimali indirimi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131lar lehine h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan manevi tazminatlar\u0131n az oldu\u011funu,<br>Daval\u0131 &#8230; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle kendilerine husumet y\u00f6neltilemeyece\u011fini, davac\u0131lar\u0131n maddi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n Kurum \u00f6demeleri ile kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini, maddi zarar hesab\u0131nda pasif d\u00f6nemin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, hesap raporunda uygulanan %10 art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, e\u015fin evlenme ihtimalinin hatal\u0131 tespit edildi\u011fini, kazan\u0131n meydana geli\u015finde davac\u0131lar murisinin tam kusurlu oldu\u011funu, h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan manevi tazminatlar\u0131n fazla oldu\u011funu,<br>Daval\u0131 &#8230; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle, davac\u0131lar\u0131n maddi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n Kurum \u00f6demeleri ile kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini, maddi zarar hesab\u0131nda pasif d\u00f6nemin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, hesap raporunda uygulanan %10 art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, e\u015fin evlenme ihtimalinin hatal\u0131 tespit edildi\u011fini, kazan\u0131n meydana geli\u015finde davac\u0131lar murisinin tam kusurlu oldu\u011funu, h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan manevi tazminatlar\u0131n fazla oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<br>F) Delillerin De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Davac\u0131lar Anne, Baba ve Karde\u015flerin Manevi Tazminat \u0130stemlerine \u0130li\u015fkin H\u00fck\u00fcmler Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<br>Miktar veya de\u011feri temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7meyen davalara ili\u015fkin nihai kararlar 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 362\/1-(a) maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilemez. Kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgilidir.<br>Davac\u0131lar\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esi ve \u0131slahla e\u015f i\u00e7in 65.571,25 TL Maddi, 150.000,00 TL Manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in, 8.844,85 TL maddi, 125.000,00 TL manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in 10.234,48 TL maddi, 125.000,00 TL manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in 17.745,17 TL Maddi, 125.000,00 TL manevi, anne ve baba i\u00e7in 50.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi, karde\u015fler i\u00e7in 25.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunduklar\u0131, ilk derece mahkemesince, davac\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n maddi tazminat istemlerinin kabul\u00fcne, e\u015f lehine 49.071,25 TL maddi, 65.000,00 TL manevi, \u00e7ocuklar lehine 40.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi, anne ve baba lehine 20.000,00&#8217;er TL manevi, karde\u015fler lehine 7.500,00&#8217;er TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verildi\u011fi, ilk derece mahkemesinin bu karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 taraflarca istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 7. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nce verilen 07\/05\/2018 tarihli kararda istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine karar verildi\u011fi, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yine taraflarca temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<br>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince 01\/01\/2018 tarihinden sonra verilen kararlar i\u00e7in kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 47.530,00 TL&#8217;dir.<br>Davac\u0131lar aras\u0131nda ihtiyari dava arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan, davac\u0131lar anne, baba ve karde\u015flerin manevi tazminat istemlerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin temyiz eden taraflar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin karar tarihi itibariyle ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 47.530,00 TL\u2019lik temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<br>O halde, davac\u0131lar anne, baba ve karde\u015flerin manevi tazminat istemleri hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin temyizi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyiz eden taraflar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 H.M.K.&#8217;nun 362\/1-a ve (2) maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<br>2-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillere, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerektirici nedenlere g\u00f6re; daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<br>3-Dava, sigortal\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f kazas\u0131 sonucunda vefat\u0131 nedeniyle yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<br>Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan davac\u0131lar murisinin vefat\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7lanan i\u015f kazas\u0131n\u0131n meydana geli\u015finde m\u00fcteveffa sigortal\u0131n\u0131n %50, daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n %30, daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 idari m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n %10, daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n %10 oran\u0131nda kusurlu olduklar\u0131, \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131na g\u00f6re sigortal\u0131ya kaza tarihi olan 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda her ay&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti<\/mark>&nbsp;\u00f6dendi\u011fi, davac\u0131lar vekilinin 08\/05\/2017 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile 19\/04\/2017 tarihli k\u00f6k hesap raporunu Kurum \u00f6demelerinin tenzili y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kabul etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<br>Zararland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 sigorta olay\u0131na maruz kalan sigortal\u0131n\u0131n veya \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc halinde yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n maddi zarar\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131nda, ger\u00e7ek \u00fccretin esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 ko\u015fuldur. <strong>Ger\u00e7ek \u00fccret i\u015f\u00e7inin olay tarihinde almakta oldu\u011fu \u00fccreti yan\u0131nda ikramiye, yemek yard\u0131m\u0131, kira yard\u0131m\u0131 gibi sosyal yard\u0131mlar\u0131 da i\u00e7eren \u00fccrettir. Yine s\u00fcreklilik arz eden \u00f6demelerin \u00fccrete dahil edilerek&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Bunun yan\u0131nda hak sahibi e\u015flerin maddi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde hesap tarihi itibariyle e\u015fin ya\u015f\u0131 ve \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak evlenme ihtimali g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmal\u0131 ve belirli oranlarda hesaplanan maddi zarardan indirim yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong><br>\u00d6te yandan usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak davalar\u0131n uzamas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek, hukuki alanda istikrar sa\u011flamak ve kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 genel g\u00fcvenin sars\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131 ile geli\u015ftirilmi\u015f, \u00f6\u011fretide kabul g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ve usul hukukunun vazge\u00e7ilmez, ana ilkelerinden biri haline gelmi\u015ftir. Anlam itibariyle, bir davada, mahkemenin yada taraflar\u0131n yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu bir usul i\u015flemi ile taraflardan biri lehine do\u011fmu\u015f ve kendisine uyulmas\u0131 zorunlu olan hakk\u0131 ifade etmektedir.<br>Somut olayda, m\u00fcteveffa sigortal\u0131ya ait \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131na g\u00f6re fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretlerinin s\u00fcreklilik arzetti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu hususu dikkate almayan&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;ihtimaline g\u00f6re karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi, davac\u0131 e\u015fin ya\u015f\u0131 ve \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hesaplanan zarardan yeniden evlenme ihtimali ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da isabetsiz olmu\u015ftur.<br><strong>Mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f, usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak ilkesi gere\u011fince 19\/04\/2017 tarihli k\u00f6k hesap raporunda belirlenen maddi zarar tutarlar\u0131ndan, Kurum taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131lar e\u015f ve \u00e7ocuklara i\u015f kazas\u0131 sigorta kolundan ba\u011flanan gelirlerin ilk pe\u015fin sermaye de\u011ferlerinin r\u00fccuya tabi k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 tenzil ederek olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar vermekten ibarettir.<br><\/strong>Mahkemece bu maddi ve hukuki olgular nazara al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozma nedenidir.<br>O halde, davac\u0131lar\u0131n bu y\u00f6nleri ama\u00e7layan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 kabul edilmeli ve B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019nun 373\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca KALDIRILMASINA, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, dosyan\u0131n ilk derece mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin de B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde davac\u0131lara iadesine, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131lara y\u00fckletilmesine, 04\/02\/2020 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>21. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019\/4074 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/494 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi &#8230; Hukuk Dairesi\u0130LK DERECEMAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi K A R A RA) Davac\u0131 \u0130stemi;Davac\u0131lar dava dilek\u00e7esi ve \u0131slahla fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere e\u015f i\u00e7in 65.571,25 TL Maddi, 150.000,00 TL Manevi, \u00e7ocuk &#8230; i\u00e7in, 8.844,85 TL maddi, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1957,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1077","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-hukuku","category-maddi-manevi-tazminat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1077"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2012,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077\/revisions\/2012"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1077"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1077"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1077"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}