{"id":1074,"date":"2023-06-01T13:41:23","date_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:41:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1074"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:41:23","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:41:23","slug":"alacaklarin-tam-miktari-belirlenmeli","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2023\/06\/01\/alacaklarin-tam-miktari-belirlenmeli\/","title":{"rendered":"Alacaklar\u0131n tam miktar\u0131 belirlenmeli"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2016\/18771 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3058 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><br>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>YARGITAY KARARI<br><br>A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin 22.04.2008 tarihinde i\u015fe girdi\u011fini, i\u015f akdinin 25.03.2009 tarihinde feshedildi\u011fini, finisher operat\u00f6r\u00fc oldu\u011funu, 1.400 USD ayl\u0131k net maa\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 3 \u00f6\u011f\u00fcn yemek verildi\u011fini ve bar\u0131nma imkan\u0131 sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f akdini hafta tatili, fazla mesai, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle hakl\u0131 olarak feshetti\u011fini, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca haftan\u0131n 7 g\u00fcn\u00fc ulusal bayram ve genel tatil g\u00fcnleri de dahil olmak \u00fczere 06:30-23:00 saatleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, alacaklar\u0131n \u00f6denmesi i\u00e7in i\u015fverene ihtar \u00e7ektiklerini, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu suretle temerr\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc iddia ederek fazla mesai, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>B) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n 24.04.2008-07.04.2009 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u015firket b\u00fcnyesinde finisher operat\u00f6r olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n br\u00fct 1.000,00 USD olarak belirlendi\u011fini, Ziraat Bankas\u0131 \u00c7orum \u015eubesi 13638927 banka hesab\u0131na her ay \u00f6deme g\u00fcn\u00fcndeki rayice g\u00f6re T\u00fcrk paras\u0131 olarak \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00fccretleri eksiksiz ve zaman\u0131nda \u00f6denmesine ra\u011fmen i\u015f akdinin davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haks\u0131z feshedildi\u011fini, daval\u0131 \u015eirketin y\u0131lda 270 saate kadar fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131rma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, fazla mesai yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kabul anlam\u0131na gelmemekle birlikte belirtilen s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara hafta i\u00e7inde bir g\u00fcn izin verildi\u011fini, genel tatil ve ulusal bayramlarda i\u015f\u00e7i \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil alaca\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, istenen faizin haks\u0131z ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>C) Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Mahkeme, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayanarak davac\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re i\u015fyerinde fazla mesai yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil g\u00fcnlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan \u00fccretlerin \u00f6dendi\u011fine ili\u015fkin dosyaya her hangi bir delil sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, y\u0131lda 270 saate kadar olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n \u00fccrete dahil olaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin her hangi bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu konuda ba\u015fkaca bir delilin dosyada yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle belirlenen \u00fccrete y\u0131lda 270 saate kadar olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n dahil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131larak, benimsenen bilirki\u015fi raporunda hesaplanan hafta tatili \u00fccreti olarak hesaplanan tutarlardan takdiren %30 hakkaniyet indirimi yap\u0131larak tespit olunan tutardan, fazla mesai, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretlerinde ise davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak tespit edilen tutarlardan daval\u0131 taraf faizleri ile birlikte sorumlu tutuldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir.<br>D) Temyiz:<br>Karar\u0131 daval\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<br>E) Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporundaki&nbsp;<mark>hesaplama<\/mark>&nbsp;tablosundan davac\u0131n\u0131n yurti\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu tarihlerin&nbsp;<mark>hesaplamadan<\/mark>&nbsp;d\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>2-Her k\u0131sm\u00ee dava alaca\u011f\u0131n tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak tespit h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7ermek zorundad\u0131r.<br>Dava k\u0131sm\u00ee dava olarak a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve \u0131slah edilmemi\u015f olsa dahi mahkemece h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan alacaklar\u0131n tam miktar\u0131 belirlenmeli, daha sonra taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak karar verilmelidir.<br>Mahkemenin h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hafta tatili d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki&nbsp;<mark>fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti<\/mark>, ulusal bayram ve genel tatili \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131na uygulanan takdiri indirimi oran\u0131 belirtilip alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 belirlenmeden dava dilek\u00e7esindeki k\u0131sm\u00ee miktarlar \u00fczerinden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<br>F) Sonu\u00e7:<br>Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine 26.02.2020 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2016\/18771 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/3058 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: YARGITAY KARARI A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin 22.04.2008 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1987,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-saglik"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1074"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1074\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2015,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1074\/revisions\/2015"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}