{"id":1050,"date":"2020-06-15T15:50:53","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T12:50:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1050"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:56:44","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:56:44","slug":"diger-yan-delillerle-desteklenmesi-gerektigi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/diger-yan-delillerle-desteklenmesi-gerektigi\/","title":{"rendered":"Di\u011fer yan delillerle desteklenmesi gerekti\u011fi"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2018\/15734 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2018\/28121 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK<br>MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; 14. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<br><br>Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 as\u0131l i\u015fveren &#8230;&#8217;na ait &#8230; Akademisi&#8217;nde yemek da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m ve da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m sonras\u0131 i\u015finde ve son olarak i\u015fi daval\u0131dan ihale ile alan&nbsp;dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 alt i\u015fveren&nbsp;nezdinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, alt i\u015fverenin iflas\u0131 sebebi ile i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin haks\u0131z olarak feshedildi\u011fini ve bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131 ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili idareye ba\u011fl\u0131 &#8230; &#8230; Akademisi Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerinde haz\u0131r yemek i\u015fini y\u00fcklenen alt i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan istihdam edildi\u011fini, alt i\u015fverenin iflas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fe al\u0131nacak ve i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak personeli idari kurumun belirlemedi\u011fini, a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6ncelikle husumet itiraz\u0131nda bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, 31.07.2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname&#8217;nin 106. maddesi uyar\u0131nca &#8230; Akademisi ve Asker Hastanelerinin &#8230;&#8217;na devredilmesi sebebiyle davada &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n taraf s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n &#8230;&#8217;na ihbar\u0131 ile husumet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firket i\u015f\u00e7isi oldu\u011fu ve daval\u0131 kurumlar\u0131n i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunun yemek hizmetinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan davac\u0131lar\u0131n yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015fin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re daval\u0131lar ile dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firket aras\u0131nda as\u0131l i\u015fveren &#8211; alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011fu ve muvazaa bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle daval\u0131lar\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131ndan sorumlu olduklar\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 sebeple feshedildi\u011fi ve talep edilen alacaklar\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011finin ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca 669 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname&#8217;nin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihi itibariyle &#8230; Akademisi&#8217;nin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc alacak ve borcu ile daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;na devredilmesi sebebiyle daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n re&#8217;sen davaya dahil edildi\u011fi belirtilerek, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n alacaklardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlu tutulmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>\u0130stinaf Ba\u015fvurusu :&nbsp;<br>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131 &#8230; ve &#8230; vekilleri istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.&nbsp;<br>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti :&nbsp;<br>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 bir sebep olmadan i\u015fverence feshedildi\u011fi ve dava konusu alacaklar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n re&#8217;sen davaya dahil edilerek aleyhine h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve davada taraf olmayan &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 352\/(1) -b maddesi gere\u011fince \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve &#8230; davada taraf olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak daval\u0131 &#8230; aleyhine h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>Temyiz Ba\u015fvurusu :&nbsp;<br>Karar\u0131, daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<br>Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Dosya kapsam\u0131n\u0131n birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131na g\u00f6re, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan y\u00f6nleri usul ve kanuna uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<br>2-Davac\u0131n\u0131n hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti hususunda taraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.&nbsp;<br>Dairemizce seri olarak incelenen somut dosyalarda; davac\u0131n\u0131n hizmet s\u00fcresi dava dilek\u00e7esindeki talep gibi hesaplanm\u0131\u015fsa da; dosyadaki delil ve belgelerin davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi t\u00fcm d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011fa ait i\u015fyerinde ge\u00e7ti\u011fini tespite elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anala\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen sebeple, davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi tarihler aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerleri belirlenerek, bu \u015firketlerin daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;ndan hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile i\u015f al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n da bu kapsamda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 denetime elverili \u015fekilde tespit edilmeli ve olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re dava konusu alacaklar gerekirse yeniden hesaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden eksik inceleme ile karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>3-Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve genel tatillerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu taraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusudur.<br>Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia eden i\u015f\u00e7i bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispatla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin imzas\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan bordro sahteli\u011fi ispat edilinceye kadar kesin delil niteli\u011findedir. Bir ba\u015fka anlat\u0131mla bordronun sahteli\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp kan\u0131tlanmad\u0131k\u00e7a, imzal\u0131 bordroda g\u00f6r\u00fcnen fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fi varsay\u0131l\u0131r.<br>Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ispat\u0131 konusunda i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131, \u00f6zellikle i\u015fyerine giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6steren belgeler, i\u015fyeri i\u00e7 yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, delil niteli\u011findedir. Ancak, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n bu t\u00fcr yaz\u0131l\u0131 belgelerle kan\u0131tlanamamas\u0131 durumunda taraflar\u0131n dinletmi\u015f olduklar\u0131 tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ile sonuca gidilmesi gerekir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda herkes\u00e7e bilinen genel baz\u0131 vak\u0131alar da bu noktada g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nabilir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin fiilen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin niteli\u011fi ve yo\u011funlu\u011funa g\u00f6re de fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<br>\u0130mzal\u0131 \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131nda fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti \u00f6dendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yorsa, i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekte daha fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Ancak, i\u015f\u00e7inin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daha fazla oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ihtirazi kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 halinde, bordroda g\u00f6r\u00fcnenden daha fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ispat\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delille s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n, bordrolar\u0131n imzal\u0131 ve ihtirazi kay\u0131ts\u0131z olmas\u0131 durumunda dahi, i\u015f\u00e7inin ge\u00e7erli bir yaz\u0131l\u0131 belge ile bordroda yaz\u0131l\u0131 olandan daha fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 delille kan\u0131tlamas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7iye bordro imzalat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti tahakkuklar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7eren her ay de\u011fi\u015fik miktarlarda \u00fccret \u00f6demelerinin banka kanal\u0131yla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda da ihtirazi kay\u0131t ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, \u00f6denenin \u00fczerinde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 delille ispatlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi sonucunu do\u011furmaktad\u0131r.<br>Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 delil ya da tan\u0131kla ispat\u0131 imk\u00e2n dahilindedir. \u0130\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczenini bilmeyen ve bilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na de\u011fer verilemez.<br>Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n belirlenmesinde 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu&#8217;nun 68. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ara dinlenme s\u00fcrelerinin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir.<br>Ulusal bayram ve genel tatil alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131 konusunda da ayn\u0131 ilkeler ge\u00e7erlidir.<br>Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131k deliline dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 255. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, aksine ciddi ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil ve olaylar bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a as\u0131l olan\u0131n tan\u0131klar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olmalar\u0131 oldu\u011fu ilkesi g\u00f6zetilerek de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.&nbsp;<br>Akrabal\u0131k veya di\u011fer bir yak\u0131nl\u0131k ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na tan\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc bir sebep say\u0131lamaz ise de i\u015fveren aleyhine dava a\u00e7an ki\u015filer davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak dinlenmi\u015f ise bu i\u015f\u00e7ilerin tan\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131na kural olarak itibar edilmemesi; birbirlerine tan\u0131kl\u0131k eden ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131na ihtiyatla yakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ile bu tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer yan delillerle birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek, sonuca gidilmesi gerekir. Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 13.04.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/2-751 E. 2011\/96 K.; 12.09.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/2 E. 2012\/551 K., 25.02.2015 g\u00fcn 2013\/9-1447 E., 2015\/854 K. ve 29.06.2016 g\u00fcn ve 2015\/22-1444 E. 2016\/869 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131 da bu y\u00f6ndedir.&nbsp;<br>Somut olay\u0131n incelenmesinde, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve genel tatil alacaklar\u0131 hesaplan\u0131rken, davac\u0131 tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 delil olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ise de davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak dinlenen i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde daval\u0131 i\u015fveren aleyhine ayn\u0131 iddialar ile dava a\u00e7an ki\u015filer oldu\u011fu ve davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve genel tatillerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair soyut tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<br><strong>Bu durumda, yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde, <\/strong><strong>di\u011fer yan delillerle desteklenmeyen<\/strong><strong> ve ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren aleyhine ayn\u0131 iddia ile a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar nedeniyle aralar\u0131nda menfaat birli\u011fi bulunan davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve genel tatil iddias\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/strong> Di\u011fer bir ifade ile davac\u0131, dinletti\u011fi tan\u0131klarla fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve genel tatillerde de \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131 y\u00f6ntemince kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ile genel tatil alaca\u011f\u0131 taleplerinin reddi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle kabul edilmesi isabetsiz olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>Sonu\u00e7:<br>Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerden BOZULMASINA, dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin karar\u0131 veren \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 24.12.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2018\/15734 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2018\/28121 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAKMAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; 14. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1927,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-isci-tazminatlari-ve-alacaklari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1050"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1050\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2027,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1050\/revisions\/2027"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}