{"id":1037,"date":"2020-06-15T15:48:02","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T12:48:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1037"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:57:07","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:57:07","slug":"davanin-davaci-iscinin-calistigi-alt-isveren-sirketlere-ihbar-edilmesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/davanin-davaci-iscinin-calistigi-alt-isveren-sirketlere-ihbar-edilmesi\/","title":{"rendered":"Davan\u0131n, davac\u0131 (i\u015f\u00e7inin) \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt i\u015fveren \u015firketlere ihbar edilmesi"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/21896 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2019\/10452 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi(M\u00fcstemir Yetkili)<br>DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<br><br>Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 nedene dayanmaks\u0131z\u0131n feshedildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131 ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, husumet itiraz\u0131nda bulunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplanan delillere ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Temyiz:<br>Karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<br>Gerek\u00e7e:&nbsp;<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<br>2-Taraflar aras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131 noktas\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.<br>4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu&#8217;nun 59. maddesinde, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin herhangi bir sebeple sona ermesi halinde, i\u015f\u00e7iye kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin s\u00fcrelerine ait \u00fccretlerin son \u00fccret \u00fczerinden \u00f6denece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccrete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi i\u00e7in i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi \u015fartt\u0131r. Bu noktada s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona erme \u015feklinin ve hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.&nbsp;<br>Y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda ispat y\u00fck\u00fc, i\u015fverene aittir. \u0130\u015fveren y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 imzal\u0131 izin defteri veya e\u015fde\u011fer bir belge ile ispatlamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu konuda ispat y\u00fck\u00fc \u00fczerinde olan i\u015fveren, i\u015f\u00e7iye yemin teklif edebilir.&nbsp;<br>Somut olayda, davac\u0131n\u0131n &#8230;Belediyesi b\u00fcnyesindeki alt i\u015fverenler nezdinde 13\/02\/2002 \u2013 31\/12\/2010 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 6 y\u0131l 10 ay 23 g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabittir. H\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda; hi\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle toplam 90 g\u00fcn \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan hesaplama mahkemece kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n 6 y\u0131l boyunca izin kullanmamas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 31. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hakimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00f6devi kapsam\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n 6 y\u0131l boyunca izin kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131larak davac\u0131 beyan\u0131 ile birlikte t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmek suretiyle karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>3-Mahkemece, daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;nin ihbar talebi de\u011ferlendirilmeden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<br>6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun davan\u0131n ihbar\u0131n\u0131 ve \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 61. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda taraflardan biri davay\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi takdirde, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin kendisine r\u00fccu edece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorsa, tahkikat sonu\u00e7lan\u0131ncaya kadar davay\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ihbar edebilece\u011fi, ihbar\u0131n \u015feklini d\u00fczenleyen 62. maddesinde ihbar\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, ihbar sebebinin gerek\u00e7eleriyle birlikte a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hangi a\u015famada bulundu\u011funun belirtilmesi gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<br><strong>Daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili mahkemeye sundu\u011fu cevap dilek\u00e7esiyle &#8230;Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcnyesindeki y\u00fcklenici firmalar nezdindeki davac\u0131ya ait sicil dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n getirtilmesini ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna itiraz\u0131nda ise davan\u0131n,&nbsp;dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 alt i\u015fveren&nbsp;\u015firketlere ihbar\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekten, davan\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt i\u015fveren \u015firketlere ihbar edilmesi ve ihbar olunan alt i\u015fveren \u015firketlerin davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u015fartlar\u0131 ve \u00f6demeler konusunda belgeler ibraz etmesi halinde talep edilen i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131nda bu belgelerin dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, davan\u0131n alt i\u015fveren \u015firketlere ihbar\u0131nda zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/strong> Daval\u0131n\u0131n bu talebini Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 61. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrede, tahkikat sonu\u00e7lanmadan, mahkemeye iletti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; mahkemece, davan\u0131n ihbar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda olumlu ya da olumsuz bir karar verilmeden ve delil olarak dayan\u0131lan i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131 getirtilmeden yarg\u0131lamaya devamla h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 hatal\u0131d\u0131r.&nbsp;<br>SONU\u00c7:Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 13\/05\/2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/21896 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2019\/10452 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi(M\u00fcstemir Yetkili)DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1922,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-isci-tazminatlari-ve-alacaklari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1037"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1037\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2028,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1037\/revisions\/2028"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}