{"id":1035,"date":"2020-06-15T13:20:40","date_gmt":"2020-06-15T10:20:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hukuk.name\/?p=1035"},"modified":"2023-06-01T13:57:28","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T13:57:28","slug":"belirsiz-veya-kismi-dava","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/2020\/06\/15\/belirsiz-veya-kismi-dava\/","title":{"rendered":"Belirsiz veya k\u0131smi dava"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/27204 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1882 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<br>DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraf vekillerince istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<br><br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin al\u0131m sat\u0131m konusu ara\u00e7lar \u00fczerinde mekanik m\u00fcdahale yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hasara u\u011fray\u0131p u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan tamirat ve par\u00e7a de\u011fi\u015fimin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vs konularda uzman olarak tespit yaparak g\u00fcvenilir bir \u015fekilde taraflar\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetine mahal vermeden al\u0131m-sat\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fyerinde 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda 4.800,00 TL ayl\u0131k \u00fccret ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6demeden i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in s\u00fcrekli ve kas\u0131tl\u0131 psikolojik bask\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sebepsiz azarlamalarla tahkirde bulundu\u011funu, i\u015fyerinde d\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu muamelelerle y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle i\u015fyerinden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak haks\u0131z yere i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fini, i\u015fyerinde haftan\u0131n alt\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 08.00-20.00 ila 21.00 aras\u0131nda, haftan\u0131n yedi g\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131k olan i\u015fyerinde pazar g\u00fcnlerinde de saat 08.00-19.00 ila 20.00 aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerini kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini belirterek k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile birlikte bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi \u00fccretin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n eksper olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, getir-g\u00f6t\u00fcr i\u015fleri yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, asgari \u00fccretle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin 9. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinin 2014\/491 esas\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda daval\u0131 \u015firkete kar\u015f\u0131 dava ikame eden davac\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak o davan\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin \u201ceksperlik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 maa\u015f\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini, c\u00fczi bir maa\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin de sat\u0131\u015f eleman\u0131 oldu\u011funu..\u201d ifade etti\u011fini, kendi beyan\u0131n da bile eksperlerin c\u00fczi bir maa\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fini, davac\u0131 i\u015ften ayr\u0131lmak isteyince hak kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, i\u015fverenin iyi niyet sonucu k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 imzas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6dedi\u011fini, y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerini kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fyerinde getir-g\u00f6t\u00fcr i\u015fleri yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n saat 09.00-18.00 ila 18.30 aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fazla mesai, hafta tatili ve genel tatil \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131 kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Mahkemece, yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda toplanan deliller ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Karar, taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm,daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>2-Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k davac\u0131ya \u00f6denen ayl\u0131k \u00fccretin miktar\u0131 konusundad\u0131r.<br>4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun 32. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda, genel anlamda \u00fccret, bir kimseye bir i\u015f kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda i\u015fveren veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan sa\u011flanan ve para ile \u00f6denen tutar olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br>\u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131, asgar\u00ee \u00fccretin alt\u0131nda kalmamak kayd\u0131yla s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00fccretin miktar\u0131n\u0131 serbest\u00e7e kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilirler. \u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde \u00fccretin miktar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131nda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez. B\u00f6yle bir durumda dahi \u00fccret, 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 401. maddesine g\u00f6re tespit olunmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde \u00fccretin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde \u00fccretin miktar\u0131, asgari \u00fccretten az olmamak \u00fczere emsal \u00fccret g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutularak belirlenir.<br>\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma hayat\u0131nda daha az vergi ya da sigorta primi \u00f6denmesi amac\u0131yla zaman zaman, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi veya \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen \u00fccretlerin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durumda ger\u00e7ek \u00fccretin tespiti \u00f6nem kazan\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin k\u0131demi, meslek unvan\u0131, fiilen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f, i\u015fyerinin \u00f6zellikleri ve emsal i\u015f\u00e7ilere \u00f6denen \u00fccretler gibi hususlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda imzal\u0131 bordrolarda yer alan \u00fccretin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphesi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu konuda tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeli ve i\u015f\u00e7inin meslekte ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcre, i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihler, meslek unvan\u0131 ve fiilen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f bildirilerek, ilgili i\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fveren kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ile T\u00fcrkiye \u0130statistik Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 internet sitesinde bulunan \u201cKazan\u00e7 bilgisi sorgulama\u201d ekran\u0131ndan emsal \u00fccretin ne olabilece\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131 ve t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek bir sonuca gidilmelidir olgusu mahkemece re&#8217;sen ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<br>Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, davac\u0131 ayl\u0131k net 4.800,00 TL \u00fccretle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 taraf, davac\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ve \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131na g\u00f6re asgari \u00fccret kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. Davac\u0131 tan\u0131klardan bir tanesi davac\u0131n\u0131n ne kadar \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini ancak 2012-2013 y\u0131llar\u0131nda 3.500,00 TL \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini beyan ederken di\u011fer davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretini bilmedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131 da davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretini bilmediklerini beyan etmi\u015flerdir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan emsal \u00fccret ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131nda &#8230; Ticaret Odas\u0131 \u00fccretin asgari \u00fccret olabilece\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin bankaya hitaben yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131da belirtti\u011fi \u00fccret olan net 4.800,00 TL dikkate al\u0131narak bu \u00fccret \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan hesaplamalara g\u00f6re alacaklar h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130\u015fverence T\u00fcrk Ekonomi Bankas\u0131 (TEB) Bankas\u0131na hitaben yaz\u0131lan yaz\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretin ispat\u0131 konusunda delil olarak dikkate al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi \u00fccreti kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fka bir dosyada tan\u0131k olarak beyan\u0131nda sat\u0131\u015f eleman\u0131 oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131da dikkate al\u0131narak tam g\u00f6rev tan\u0131m\u0131 belirlenerek emsal \u00fccret ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 buna g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Emsal \u00fccret ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 cevab\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmek suretiyle davac\u0131n\u0131n ayl\u0131k \u00fccreti belirlenmeli ve hesaplamalarda bu miktar esas al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<br>3-Taraflar aras\u0131nda davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.<br><strong>Davac\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmeden fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutmak suretiyle k\u0131smi olarak bildirdi\u011fi alacaklar\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir. Sonras\u0131nda da tam \u0131slah yap\u0131larak usul\u00fcne uygun bir \u015fekilde dava belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, davan\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 107. maddesine g\u00f6re belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilerek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur. Davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/strong>Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak, k\u0131smi davaya ili\u015fkin kurallara g\u00f6re g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur.<br>Yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan sonra, k\u0131smi davada fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n sakl\u0131 tutulmu\u015f olmas\u0131, sakl\u0131 tutulan kesim i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesmez, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, alaca\u011f\u0131n yaln\u0131z k\u0131smi dava konusu yap\u0131lan miktar i\u00e7in kesilir. Bu halde daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esine kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def-i dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur.Ayr\u0131ca talep edilen ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izin alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan talep edilen miktar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan dava tarihinden, bakiye k\u0131sm\u0131 i\u00e7in \u0131slah tarihinden itibaren faiz i\u015fletilmesi gerekirken dava tarihinden itibaren faize h\u00fckmedilmesi de hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<br>SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgililere iadesine, 06.02.2020 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>22. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2017\/27204 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2020\/1882 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f MahkemesiDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraf vekillerince istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1924,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-isci-tazminatlari-ve-alacaklari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1035"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1035\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2029,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1035\/revisions\/2029"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukuk.name\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}